Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Full Title:

Feds Get the Power to Seize Medical Records on 'Fishing Expedition' Investigations with No Subpoena from a Judge

1 posted on 07/22/2015 6:35:10 PM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Whenifhow
For those people who have heart conditions, I hope the government takes note of that before sending them off to 'Information Retrieval' ...


2 posted on 07/22/2015 6:40:48 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow; COUNTrecount; Nowhere Man; FightThePower!; C. Edmund Wright; jacob allen; ...
At no point in history has any government ever wanted its people to be defenseless for any good reason ~ nully's son

The biggest killer of mankind

Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!

To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I don't add you to the list...


3 posted on 07/22/2015 6:42:54 PM PDT by null and void (If the government can't protect the Marines, how can we expect it to protect us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow

Tyranny...


4 posted on 07/22/2015 6:43:15 PM PDT by JDoutrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan; All

From the article:

A 1946 Supreme Court opinion used in the Zadeh case to justify warrantless searches of medical records received a scathing and prescient dissent by liberal Justice Frank Murphy. Murphy wrote:

To allow a nonjudicial officer, unarmed with judicial process, to demand the books and papers of an individual is an open invitation to abuse of that power. It is no answer that the individual may refuse to produce the material demanded. Many persons have yielded solely because of the air of authority with which the demand is made, a demand that cannot be enforced without subsequent judicial aid. Many invasions of private rights thus occur without the restraining hand of the judiciary ever intervening.

Only by confining the subpoena power exclusively to the judiciary can there be any insurance against this corrosion of liberty. Statutory enforcement would not thereby be made impossible. Indeed, it would be made easier. A people’s desire to cooperate with the enforcement of a statute is in direct proportion to the respect for individual rights shown in the enforcement process.

Quoting the Declaration of Independence, Justice Murphy noted how such methods of searches were so contrary to liberty and law that they previously contributed to “successful revolt.”


5 posted on 07/22/2015 6:48:06 PM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow

HIPAA, the one part of HillaryCare that was passed, claims to be to protect medical privacy, but in reality lets the government have whatever it wants.


6 posted on 07/22/2015 7:07:35 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (Obama been Liberal. Hope Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow

This needs to be fixed. Restraints on government power apply to all government entities, not just to police. I’m generally not a fan of civil rights lawsuits, but I’d give the victims of this thuggish action hundreds of millions of dollars each - so much that it would deter future violations of the 4th Amendment.


8 posted on 07/22/2015 8:03:57 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

So how many Freepers still support the War on Drugs?


9 posted on 07/22/2015 8:44:42 PM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow

Had ENOUGH Yet ?


11 posted on 07/22/2015 10:32:05 PM PDT by S.O.S121.500 (Had ENOUGH Yet ? ........................ Enforce the Bill of Rights .........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson