Posted on 07/22/2015 6:34:03 PM PDT by markomalley
Judicial Watch announced today that it has obtained documents from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that confirm that the IRS used donor lists to tax-exempt organizations to target those donors for audits. The documents also show IRS officials specifically highlighted how the U.S. Chamber of Commerce may come under high scrutiny from the IRS. The IRS produced the records in a Freedom of Information lawsuit seeking documents about selection of individuals for audit-based application information on donor lists submitted by Tea Party and other 501(c)(4) tax-exempt organizations (Judicial Watch v. Internal Revenue Service (No. 1:15-cv-00220)).
A letter dated September 28, 2010, then-Democrat Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) informs then-IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman: I request that you and your agency survey major 501(c)(4), (c)(5) and (c)(6) organizations In reply, in a letter dated February 17, 2011, Shulman writes: In the work plan of the Exempt Organizations Division, we announced that beginning in FY2011, we are increasing our focus on section 501(c)(4), (5) and (6) organizations.
In 2010, after receiving Baucuss letter, the IRS considered the issue of auditing donors to 501(c)(4) organizations, alleging that a 35 percent gift tax would be due on donations in excess of $13,000. The documents show that the IRS wanted to cross-check donor lists from 501(c)(4) organizations against gift tax filings and commence audits against taxpayers based on this information.
A gift tax on contributions to 501(c)(4)s was considered by most to be a dead letter since the IRS had never enforced the rule after the Supreme Court ruled that such taxes violated the First Amendment. The documents show that the IRS had not enforced the gift tax since 1982.
But then, in February 2011, at least five donors of an unnamed organization were audited.
The documents show that Crossroads GPS, associated with Republican Karl Rove, was specifically referenced by IRS officials in the context of applying the gift tax. Seemingly in response to the Crossroads focus, on April 20, IRS attorney Lorraine Gardner emails a 501(c)(4) donor list to former Branch Chief in the IRS Office of the Chief Counsel James Hogan. Later, this information is apparently shared with IRS Estate Gift and Policy Manager Lisa Piehl while Gardner seeks information about any of the donors.
Emails to and from Lorraine Gardner also suggested bias against the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. An IRS official (whose name is redacted) emails Gardner on May 13, 2011, a blog post responding to the IRS targeting of political and other activities of 501(c)(4), (5) and (6) organizations:
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is a 501(c)(6) organization and may find itself under high scrutiny. One can only hope.
The subject line of the email highlights this anti-Chamber of Commerce comment: we are making headlines notice the end regarding 501(c)(6) applicability enjoy. This critical comment is forwarded to other IRS officials and shows up attached to another Gardner IRS email chain with the subject line re: 501(c)(4) that discusses a pending decision about a tax-exempt entity.
In early May, once the media began reporting on the IRS audits of donors, IRS officials reacted quickly. One official acknowledges the issue is a biggy when a reporter from The New York Times contacts the IRS on May 9.
On May 13, 2011, former IRS Director of Legislative Affairs Floyd Williams discusses compliance with interest from Capitol Hill: Not surprisingly, interest on the hill is picking up on this issue with Majority Leader Reids office, has suggested the possibility of a briefing for the Senate Finance Committee staff on general issues related to section 501(c)(4) organizations I think we should do it as interest is likely to grow as we get closer to elections.
Later that day, then-Director of the Exempt Organizations Lois Lerner weighs in with an email that confirms that she supported the gift tax audits. Lerner acknowledges that the courts have said specifically that contributions to 527 political organizations are not subject to the gift taxnothing that Im aware of that about contributions to organizations that are not political organizations. Section 501(c)(4) organizations are not political organizations. [Emphasis in original]
Lerners involvement and support for the new gift tax contradicts the IRS statement to the media at the time that audits were not part of a broader effort looking at donations 501(c)(4)s. In July 2011, the IRS retreated and soon-to-be Acting IRS Commissioner Steven Miller directed that examination resources should not be expended on this issue and that all audits of taxpayers relating to the application of gift taxes to 501(c)(4) organizations should be closed.
These documents that we had to force out of the IRS prove that the agency used donor lists to audit supporters of organizations engaged in First Amendment-protected lawful political speech, said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. And the snarky comments about the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the obsession with Karl Roves Crossroads GPS show that the IRS was targeting critics of the Obama administration. President Obama may want to continue to lie about his IRS scandal. These documents tell the truth his IRS hated conservatives and was willing to illegally tax and audit citizens to shut down opposition to Barack Obamas policies and reelection.
Judicial Watch had filed a separate lawsuit for records about targeting of individuals for audit in November 2013. In that litigation, the IRS had refused to search any email systems, including Lerners records. A federal court ruled the IRS search was sufficient and dismissed the lawsuit earlier this month.
In September 2014, another Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit forced the release of documents detailing that the IRS sought, obtained and maintained the names of donors to Tea Party and other conservative groups. IRS officials acknowledged in these documents that such information was not needed. The documents also show that the donor names were being used for a secret research project.
The House Ways and Means Committee announced at a May 7, 2014, hearing that, after scores of conservative groups provided donor information to the IRS, nearly one in ten donors were subject to audit. In 2011, as many as five donors to the conservative 501(c)(4) organization Freedoms Watch were audited, according to the Wall Street Journal. Bradley Blakeman, Freedoms Watchs former president, also alleges he was personally targeted by the IRS.
In February 2014, then-Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee Dave Camp (R-MI) detailed improper IRS targeting of existing conservative groups:
Additionally, we now know that the IRS targeted not only right-leaning applicants, but also right-leaning groups that were already operating as 501(c)(4)s. At Washington, DCs direction, dozens of groups operating as 501(c)(4)s were flagged for IRS surveillance, including monitoring of the groups activities, websites and any other publicly available information. Of these groups, 83 percent were right-leaning. And of the groups the IRS selected for audit, 100 percent were right-leaning.
I’m shocked....shocked I say.
Outstanding summation from JW. The links between the IRS, dems in Congress and the utterly depraved Obama WH is made clear.
Bookmarking for later pingout....
McCain was in the mix from what I understand.
Bkmrk.
JW is doing the job Congress REFUSES to do.
I would still like to know how many FReepers have been audited.
I’ve audited since 2012, they went back a few years.First time, since I’m real conservative ;) filing. I was informed by the IRS that there maybe some discrepancies in my returns. Show us the documentation or show us the money.
They did find a minor ohchit on one, I wrote them a check, then the state came after me because I gave the feds some more money. I paid them, but they still seized my 2014 refund, took awhile to get it.
Maybe just a coincidence.
LOL, I just donated to Sheriff Joe & to Donald Trump, probably get scrutinized (like a colonoscopy) again.
Hang em high.
Who are we to believe - the President or our own lyin' eyes?
Had ENOUGH Yet ?
Thanks GOPJ.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.