Add to that the fact that the parents’ home address is irrelevant to presidential eligibility, particularly after 54 years.
There are four elements to documenting Article II Section 1 eligibility via a birth certificate: (1) place of birth, (2) date of birth, (3) official certification, and (4) governmental seal.
Also, there is no state in the union and no federal law that requires a candidate or a president to document their eligibility by using a birth certificate. Under federal statutes, a U.S. passport is the preferred form of evidence to be presented to document citizenship status and identity.
It's an egregious case of the "I've only got one argument to make, so I'll just keep on that point" technique.
But of course it's all relevant. If no one alive today recalls a pregnant Stanley Ann in Hawaii, that means Obama couldn't have been born there. And since (by equal force) no one recalls a pregnant Stanley Ann anywhere else that means Obama was not born anywhere on earth! So THAT means either 1) he was found in a cabbage patch or 2) he's an extraterrestrial alien. In either case he's not a "natural born citizen."
I'm afraid we're stuck.
You could just save a lot of time by saying election officials in all 50 states are ignorant and stupid.
As for the "Federal Law", yes there is. It is called "Article II" and it does not need to stipulate the means to accomplish this, it only needed to stipulate that it be done. People in 1787 weren't F***ing Idiots like they are today, and didn't need things spelled out for them.
Unfortunately, Public education and Media propaganda have lobotomized otherwise intelligent people into believe crap and shirking their responsibility.