There you go again. Nobody said two weeks was the "cut off." That's you inserting bullsh*t.
What was said is that other freepers posted proof that No Airlines of that period would permit a two week old infant to fly because pressurization changes could burst their eardrums.
Get it right.
And Toots sending S.A. off Canada to hide the pregnancy -- only to then as quickly fill out the paperwork which blows the desired secrecy -- makes little sense.
Mr. Dense-head. There is no embarrassment in filling out paperwork. What would have been Embarrassing to White Kansan Parents in 1961 would be having their White Daughter show up around their friends with an obviously black baby.
At that period in History, I suspect there were more than a few fathers who would have killed their daughters in the same circumstances. Worst Race Riots in the United States were in Tulsa, just a short distance away from where Madelyn was born and just a little further away from where Stanley Armour was born.
This is you. Dodge the major point deliberately, and focus on the nothing, inconsequential trivial point, and hope nobody notices what you are doing.
You also have no comprehension of "zeitgeist." You are a babe in the Historical woods.
Nonsequitturs all.
My point remains that no one at the airlines would know the infant BHO was two weeks old unless Stanley Ann stated that affirmatively. She wanted to head to Seattle; it appears she managed to get through that obstacle.
At that period in History, I suspect there were more than a few fathers who would have killed their daughters in the same circumstances.
No doubt true. Though the Dunhams by all accounts maintained a good relationship with both their daughter and their grandson. Perhaps time on the west coast and Hawaii eased their heartland attitudes a bit.
This is you. Dodge the major point deliberately,
Which point is the "major point?" Again, Mr "I will only respond to selected portions of what you write" DumbDumb, you are too funny.