Certainly Lying childish idiot, right after you point out where the Constitution mentions "guns."
Oh, and the necessary elements of "bullets."
:)
In 1787, the average person would have understood "arms" in the "the peoples' right to bear arms" to include guns, a thing then existing. Scalia makes this very point in the Heller case.
By contrast, no one in 1787 would have understood "no one except a natural born citizen" to mean "you have to proffer a birth certificate," a thing that didn't then exist.
One is an apple. One is an orange. Clearly, you are too dense to tell them apart.