So many words to deny that you did what you did. I.e.: you said ‘all these dead people would have affirmed I’m right...because I’m right.’
I have no doubt you have prepared many dead people to take the witness stand and give verbal testimony in a trial. Sounds exactly like something you’d do.
BTW, if you can’t answer the question I asked, don’t bother answering a question I didn’t ask.
Which are words I never said. You're up to your old stupid tricks again.
TThere is reason to believe a few of them would have affirmed to Maraniss what they had already affirmed. S.A. and Lolo submitted a school application stating Obama was born in Honolulu, HI, on Aug 4, 1961. Why is it to be supposed she would have told Maraniss differently? Obama Sr. Told the INS he had a son (named Barack Obama) born in Hawaii. Why is it to be supposed he would have told Maraniss differently? Dr. Sinclair signed the birth certificate. HIPAA considerations aside, why is it to be supposed he would have told Maraniss differently?
It's not because "I am right" (though I am). It's because there is sound reason based on other evidence to surmise what these witnesses would have told Maraniss.