Would that be #63, where you make the claim that the address issue is the 'key to understanding Obama's LFBC' but in no way attempt to explain in what way it's the "key?" Assertion without argument is meaningless.
The info is there, but you will not be able to process it. This is not merely due to your obot-blinders
No, it'd due to your being daft and incomprehensible.
And your "off script" bit is only your penchant for going off-topic. I have a much different recollection of prior exchanges.
But what Nero asked: even if S.A. hadn't lived at her parent's address, so what? Right after my child left for college, we moved. He would put down our (parents') address as "his" address, even though for the better part of a year he'd never lived there. It's quite possible S.A., due to the scandalous nature of the pregnancy and/or limited space at the parents' place, lived with some kindly person her parents found to care for her in those final months till delivery. It's temporary. So it's no surprise that temporary address wasn't used.
You still haven't made the argument as to why the address makes one whit's difference. To make assertions is easy. To substantiate those assertions with argument takes intelligence.
So what's the problem? Daft and incomprehensible is your stock in trade.
Anyone who advocates for Anchor babies and Birth tourists is some sort of idiot anyways.