You've yet to establish the relevancy of your point to anything under discussion.
There is no online write up of his first house/the one he was brought home to.
With someone like George W. Bush, it was a simple matter to go talk to George H.W. and Barbara about the details of the home to which W was brought (as the biographer referenced in the NYT article no doubt did).
The deficiency in the accounts of Manniss and others is that they didn't talk to Stanley Ann, BHO (Sr), Grandpa Stanley or Toots -- the people who would have had the best firsthand information about where Stanley Ann brought the baby after the Hospital stay. So the accounts are not complete by any stretch.
You're trying to draw a conclusion from an incomplete account. Apparently, you can't see why that makes your conclusion problematic.
You don’t get it, and you never will. This, despite the point not being at all complex. Go back and read my first post re: an address appearing on the BC at which SAD and the baby never lived. The info is there, but you will not be able to process it. This is not merely due to your obot-blinders. It is also due to a general lack of acuity. I first noticed the full extent of the latter that time you went briefly off your script. You may not recall the full idiocy of what you posted. I, however, cannot forget it. It was a huge, gaping window into the problem.
And the problem persists. Believe me, I would LOVE to discuss all this with a very intelligent anti-birther.
Problem is, I have yet to meet one.
“You’ve yet to establish the relevancy of your point to anything under discussion.”
To what point are you alluding?