Question of the day: Will the National Socialist Left Now call for the banning of Radical Islam?

7/17/2015

[Fred Hayek]

Even when ISIS calls him one of their own, the Left will be in overdrive to find that this person is a full fledged member of the Tea Party. and to state the obvious that he’s a Muzzie terrorist (redundancy?) will be countered with cries of racism and demands that anyone who commits the thoughtcrime of telling the truth be deprived of their livelihood.

[tallyhoe]

Ban Guns!!!!

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Realistically, the left needs to rid the US of “Radical Confederacy” before tackling “radical Islam”.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

:: Being on the political right is not synonymous with being righteous. ::

Neither is it synonymous with “conspiracy theory” yet the media always reports it that way.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

:: yet another double standard of the National Socialist Left ::

But today there is a “crevice of difference” so the media can come out unscathed.

That being, in Nazi Germany, the double-standard was sanctioned and actually executed by the Nazi party {political party of power}; everyday citizens were not directly involved outside of tattling on their friends and family and, of course, JUDEN.

In today’s America, the hypocrisy is covered-up by the lap-dog media.
Bread and Circuses.

BTW, this is what is colloquially called, “The Chicago Way”.

[Voice of Reason1]

These frothingly articles are tiresome. Can't the point be made some other way? Being on the political right is not synonymous with being righteous. And if being on the left makes one utterly demonic, then more than half of the US population is utterly demonic.

WTF do you mean by the term ‘frothingly’ anyway?

[GOPJ]

How can they call for a ban on something they don’t think exists?

Liberal live in unicorn land...

[Voice of Reason1]

And when I read articles like this one, which presuppose that left=evil and right=good, I am reminded of how ridiculous that presupposition is.

Where was that stated in the piece? Can I arbitrarily misstate what you're saying in order to deflect the argument?

[Voice of Reason1]

Yes, they don’t see radical Islam as threat because it can’t take away their power.

They don’t care what radical Islam does to people around the world.

[Old Sarge]

To your post, I say:

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Love your tag line but, but really, Trower and Clapton are still choking their Fender and My Uncle Ted is still throttling his Gibson.

It all that crappy!

[Sergio]

bkmk

[Calpublican]

No I don’t. I just know The Dictator wants a gun ban and we better hop to it.

[Voice of Reason1]

OK, sorry for misinterpreting your intent.

I would tend to agree with you.... and that unfortunately you are right.