IMPEACH the POS if he vetos it............
If they don't approve it, there should be nothing for him to veto....end of deal.
>> The Senate's Role in Treaties
The Constitution provides that the president "shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur" (Article II, section 2). The Constitution's framers gave the Senate a share of the treaty power in order to give the president the benefit of the Senate's advice and counsel, check presidential power, and safeguard the sovereignty of the states by giving each state an equal vote in the treatymaking process.
It’s a bill that OBJECTS to making a deal. So, if NOTHING is done on the bill, then the deal is purely a presidential action.
If something is voted on, then they vote “yes” to say “no”. Who would craft such a monstrosity?
The republicans led by Bob Corker.
So, if they vote to ‘not have a deal’, then it can be vetoed. Then they need 2/3 to override and ensure there is no deal.
Rather than disapproving of something, Obama is disapproving nothing. Normally, Congress wants to spend money, wants to build a bridge....whatever. The president disapproves of that initiative.
A deal by any other name is called a treaty in the normal world.