Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defining Hillary Clinton
Townhall.com ^ | July 16, 2015 | Cal Thomas

Posted on 07/16/2015 6:29:02 AM PDT by Kaslin

When I listen to Hillary Clinton speak, as she did Monday at The New School in New York, outlining her "economic policy" should she become president, my first reaction was not to her lack of substance and the predictability of her party line about taxing the rich more and "income inequality," but to how boring she is.

I love definitions. They help focus the mind. But not everyone defines a word the same way.

Dictionary.com defines "bore" in several ways, all of which fit Hillary Clinton. As a verb used with an object, it says, "to weary by dullness, tedious repetition..." As a noun it is defined as "a dull, tiresome, or uncongenial person; a cause of ennui or petty annoyance."

Even the synonyms for "bore" seem to describe Hillary Clinton: "fatigue, tire, annoy."

She can raise her voice, as she did in her Monday speech, but that does nothing for her credibility, or sincerity. A June 2 CNN/ORC poll found that "A growing number of people say she is not honest and trustworthy (57 percent, up from 49 percent in March)." Decibel levels can't touch that.

In an interview last week with CNN, Clinton defended herself against the public's perception that she is not trustworthy, though when you have to attest to your integrity it reminds one of Richard Nixon's "I am not a crook" claim during the Watergate scandal. Hillary Clinton knows about that because she was an aide to the House Judiciary Committee investigating the cover-up.

In examining her statement earlier this month that Democratic presidents, like her husband, would have paid down the national debt (she ignores the current one who has substantially increased it), Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler wrote, "It is certainly fair game for Hillary Clinton to compare the fiscal record of the Clinton administration with the record of the George W. Bush administration (just as Republicans like to compare Jimmy Carter to Ronald Reagan). But she goes too far to suggest that a Democrat could have preserved the surpluses and paid down the national debt, when a good chunk of that supposed (Clinton) surplus was based on a forecasting error."

Kessler gave Hillary Clinton's claim two out of a possible four "Pinocchios."

There is nothing she has accomplished that qualifies her to be president and much that ought to disqualify her. She is running primarily on her gender and the standard boilerplate Democratic Party mantra of bigger government, higher taxes and more regulations, which would result in less individual liberty. If Americans want that, they can have truckloads of it by voting for Bernie Sanders, the socialist senator from Vermont.

Clinton's economic speech included a plan to raise middle-class income. She wants to accomplish this with another hike in the minimum wage and by use of other manipulative government techniques.

A better way would be to encourage people to make themselves more valuable to their employers by taking college classes, made possible by Pell grants, student loans, scholarships or help from nonprofits and churches, or advanced-training classes, often offered by employers, which would make them more marketable, put them in line for better positions that pay more and make it easier for them to change jobs if they hit a wage ceiling. Government might also help people secure higher-paying work in other cities and states by providing tax credits, or deductions, if they find a better job. Such a plan could also work to help the unemployed and underemployed find full-time work.

People might then come to depend less on government and more on themselves, and that is not at the heart of Democratic Party ideology. Less reliance on government equals less reliance on and possibly fewer votes for Democrats, the party of big government.

To employ a tennis term, Hillary Clinton has double-faulted. She is both uninspiring and uninteresting. To mix sports metaphors, add boring and you'd have a hockey hat trick.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: demonrat; economicpolicy; hillaryclinton

1 posted on 07/16/2015 6:29:02 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Despotic, pathological liar. Three words. There!


2 posted on 07/16/2015 6:31:18 AM PDT by alstewartfan (If I should live to be seven I might forget Stephanie. Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alstewartfan

The word ‘hag’ comes to mind


3 posted on 07/16/2015 6:32:26 AM PDT by SMARTY ("What is freedom? To have the will to be responsible for one's self. "M. Stirner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Defining Hillary Clinton? how about describing her as a corrupt, alcoholic, closeted lesbian who while holding high office laundered bribes through donations to her phony foundation and through Bill’s highly paid boring speeches.


4 posted on 07/16/2015 6:33:37 AM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I find it interesting how many of the progressive “feminists” have virtually no accomplishments of their own save bouncing a successful man. Examples? The Hillabeast, Pelosi, Boxer, etc. None of them are worth even an aside cough.

Not so for the many conservative women out there who have made it on their own.

Hillary couldn’t run a fruit stand.


5 posted on 07/16/2015 6:37:54 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Hillary's latest campaign salvo is true to the
credo of the Democrat Party
: keeping the snarling
abortion worshippers at bay by upping the political
ante at every election cycle.

"A vote for me is a vote for a Fully-Fornicating Society.
I pledge non-stop aggression over the unborn.
I will end the punishment of an unwanted birth."

===========================================

The genital-sniffing Planned Parenthood abortion worshippers who populate the Dem party are crazy over the Clintons......Bill and Hillary are the living breathing embodiment of The Fully-Fornicating Society w/ none of the evidence of sexual activity.....the "nuisance" of an actual child being born.

Bill gives sex-obsessed lefties a vicarious thrill....visions of the married, gray-haired Clinton getting a young WH intern to crawl under his desk to give him a BJ is better than Viagra.

=================================================

(Groan) God only knows what blood, gore and baby body parts Hillary will throw the genital-sniffing rubbermaids to assure them "her aggression over the unborn" will continue...and is her prime interest.

Maybe Hillary will distribute videos of politically-correct abortions that produce more profit-making baby body parts----as the true measure of her abortion worship?

6 posted on 07/16/2015 6:38:23 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

She Who Must Not Be Named is the most ruthless and incompetent woman ever to stalk the halls of power. Never forget that she is a student and disciple of Saul Alinsky. She has used the Rules for Radicals extensively in clawing her way to the top.

Her ultimate goal has always been the Oval Office. Her boast of being “Co-President” was not idle hubris. When her legal career was thwarted after Watergate, she married into power, using William the Impeached as a stepping stone.

She then used the NY Senate seat as another springboard to power but was foiled again, this time by the Chicago Machine, who had already chosen Odinga to carry the party banner.

Examine her personality. She has the need to dominate. It’s not enough that people obey her commands; they must be forced to obey against their will, or the needed gratification is not derived.

She is a compulsive liar. She is a consummate fraud. She is a lesbian with a deep-seated hatred of the men who, in her mind, deny her her rightful place in history. Never again must she be allowed to approach the levers of authority, for that day will spell the doom of the Republic.


7 posted on 07/16/2015 6:38:42 AM PDT by Old Sarge (Its the Sixties all over again, but with crappy music...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

OK OK, I forgot one. Four words! lol


8 posted on 07/16/2015 6:41:14 AM PDT by alstewartfan (If I should live to be seven I might forget Stephanie. Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Dear Cal, ‘definitions’ are now meaningless. Words now mean whatever the SCOTUS wants them to mean.


9 posted on 07/16/2015 6:44:38 AM PDT by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Clinton defended herself against the public's perception that she is not trustworthy, though when you have to attest to your integrity it reminds one of Richard Nixon's "I am not a crook" claim during the Watergate scandal. Hillary Clinton knows about that because she was an aide to the House Judiciary Committee investigating the cover-up.


10 posted on 07/16/2015 6:47:21 AM PDT by null and void (We've always been at war with Iceageia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The “American” people believe in all things Clinton; while they passed on her for one more “exciting” in 2008, they are ready now for 2016.


11 posted on 07/16/2015 6:49:50 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

The American people don’t like scurrilous truth.


12 posted on 07/16/2015 6:50:22 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

Yes, the American people love having HRC to dominate their little minds.


13 posted on 07/16/2015 6:51:24 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The best way to DEFINE HILLARY:


14 posted on 07/16/2015 6:53:11 AM PDT by red-dawg (NO Prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: red-dawg

BTTT


15 posted on 07/16/2015 7:11:17 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

16 posted on 07/16/2015 7:13:09 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Love the graphic.


17 posted on 07/16/2015 7:14:31 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: alstewartfan

First of all Hillary is a paranoid.


18 posted on 07/16/2015 7:18:07 AM PDT by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Another definition of ‘bore’ is the kind that brain worms do. That’s how I feel whenever I listen to this woman.


19 posted on 07/16/2015 8:21:20 AM PDT by NurdlyPeon (It is the nature of liberals to pervert whatever they touch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson