Nothing in the article put the right to keep and bear arms into question. That had nothing to do with the events. If you somehow think any mention of a gun should prompt a rant about the 2nd Amendment, then I'm afraid it's you who aren't serious.
As for your other quotes, once I again I don't get your point. What I said in those other threads was correct and was worth saying. So?
Explain yourself a little more please.
I listed a few of those points you made previous
to our discussion on the shooter article. Please
pick one and explain it. I’d like to know a little
more because I think you may be on to something in
a few of those.
Thanks!