Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Coming Era of Civil Disobedience?
http://www.cnsnews.com ^ | July 10, 2015 | Patrick J. Buchanan

Posted on 07/12/2015 7:43:26 PM PDT by NKP_Vet

The Oklahoma Supreme Court, in a 7-2 decision, has ordered a monument of the Ten Commandments removed from the Capitol. Calling the Commandments "religious in nature and an integral part of the Jewish and Christian faiths," the court said the monument must go.

Gov. Mary Fallin has refused. And Oklahoma lawmakers instead have filed legislation to let voters cut out of their constitution the specific article the justices invoked. Some legislators want the justices impeached.

Fallin's action seems a harbinger of what is to come in America — an era of civil disobedience like the 1960s, where court orders are defied and laws ignored in the name of conscience and a higher law.

Only this time, the rebellion is likely to arise from the right.

Certainly, Americans are no strangers to lawbreaking. What else was our revolution but a rebellion to overthrow the centuries-old rule and law of king and Parliament, and establish our own?

U.S. Supreme Court decisions have been defied, and those who defied them lionized by modernity. Thomas Jefferson freed all imprisoned under the sedition act, including those convicted in court trials presided over by Supreme Court justices. Jefferson then declared the law dead.

Some Americans want to replace Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill with Harriet Tubman, who, defying the Dred Scott decision and fugitive slave acts, led slaves to freedom on the Underground Railroad.

New England abolitionists backed the anti-slavery fanatic John Brown, who conducted the raid on Harpers Ferry that got him hanged but helped to precipitate a Civil War. That war was fought over whether 11 Southern states had the same right to break free of Mr. Lincoln's Union as the 13 colonies did to break free of George III's England.

Millions of Americans, with untroubled consciences, defied the Volstead Act, imbibed alcohol and brought an end to Prohibition.

In the civil rights era, defying laws mandating segregation and ignoring court orders banning demonstrations became badges of honor.

Rosa Parks is a heroine because she refused to give up her seat on a Birmingham bus, despite the laws segregating public transit that relegated blacks to the "back of the bus."

In "Letter from Birmingham Jail," Dr. King, defending civil disobedience, cited Augustine — "an unjust law is no law at all" — and Aquinas who defined an unjust law as "a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law."

Said King, "one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws."

But who decides what is an "unjust law"?

If, for example, one believes that abortion is the killing of an unborn child and same-sex marriage is an abomination that violates "eternal law and natural law," do those who believe this not have a moral right if not a "moral responsibility to disobey such laws"?

Rosa Parks is celebrated. But the pizza lady who said her Christian beliefs would not permit her to cater a same-sex wedding was declared a bigot. And the LGBT crowd, crowing over its Supreme Court triumph, is writing legislation to make it a violation of federal civil rights law for that lady to refuse to cater that wedding.

But are people who celebrate the Stonewall riots in Greenwich Village as the Mount Sinai moment of their movement really standing on solid ground to demand that we all respect the Obergefell decision as holy writ?

And if cities, states or Congress enact laws that make it a crime not to rent to homosexuals, or to refuse services at celebrations of their unions, would not dissenting Christians stand on the same moral ground as Dr. King if they disobeyed those laws?

Already, some businesses have refused to comply with the Obamacare mandate to provide contraceptives and abortion-inducing drugs to their employees. Priests and pastors are going to refuse to perform same-sex marriages. Churches and chapels will refuse to host them. Christian colleges and universities will deny married-couple facilities to homosexuals.

Laws will be passed to outlaw such practices as discrimination, and those laws, which the Christians believe violate eternal law and natural law, will, as Dr. King instructed, be disobeyed.

And the removal of tax exemptions will then be on the table.

If a family disagreed as broadly as we Americans do on issues so fundamental as right and wrong, good and evil, the family would fall apart, the couple would divorce, and the children would go their separate ways.

Something like that is happening in the country.

A secession of the heart has already taken place in America, and a secession, not of states, but of people from one another, caused by divisions on social, moral, cultural, and political views and values, is taking place.

America is disuniting, Arthur Schlesinger Jr. wrote 25 years ago.

And for those who, when young, rejected the views, values and laws of Eisenhower's America, what makes them think that dissenting Americans in this post-Christian and anti-Christian era will accept their laws, beliefs, values?

Why should they?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: buchanan; cw2; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; obergefell; oklahoma; samesex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: NKP_Vet

bump


21 posted on 07/12/2015 10:23:11 PM PDT by gattaca (Republicans believe every day is July 4, democrats believe every day is April 15. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

I gave up writing, waving signs and calling our non-representative representatives years ago. What a waste of time.

Just dealing with the bureaucratic arrogance of the SOBs who answered their phones made me uncivil.


22 posted on 07/12/2015 10:23:29 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

The problems and anger has been brewing since the 2008 Bailout by George Bush. At least since that point things have gone mush worse than expected.


23 posted on 07/12/2015 11:51:17 PM PDT by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

I see the seeds of a a new American Revolution have been sown and I expect it will as bloody as the first.


24 posted on 07/13/2015 8:44:10 AM PDT by The Great RJ (“Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money.” Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

Thanks for the link.

I disagree with classic civil disobedience where people organize and break some law. It implicitly assumes that the other side is civil and cares about how many people they toss in jail. Given the rise of the prison industry and its cronies, I think its safe to assume that caesar would happily lock up half the population and tax the other half to keep them in jail. I also think conservatives are more effective while out of jail than in. So I think CD is largely a fool’s errand.

That is not to say that I suggest blind obedience. I think that’s almost as silly. No, what I think conservatives should be doing is using all the tools at our disposal to go around the edicts and dictats. For example, to this day I cannot understand why any healthy person or family would consent to obamacare or the penalty. There are the health sharing ministries and numerous waivers and exceptions. As for things like being forced to bake cakes for homosexuals, who in their right mind would have a business like that in the open anyway? That’s just inviting trouble from a parade of petty bureaucrats and criminals.

l see no reason to advocate law breaking. However it hasn’t missed my notice that 30 million illegal aliens seem to be doing just fine by operating under the radar.


25 posted on 07/13/2015 9:10:51 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat ( The ballot is a suggestion box for slaves and fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson