Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Big brother just keeps getting bigger.
1 posted on 07/11/2015 10:10:14 AM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: aimhigh

Oh Ya, this is super.


2 posted on 07/11/2015 10:23:37 AM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh
The US DOJ funded a big project to do this using millimeter-wave radar, back in the 1990s.

Project failed because of inadequate pattern-recognition software.

3 posted on 07/11/2015 10:23:38 AM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

In three years these things, miniaturized and associated with cameras will be on every street corner in Britain and shortly thereafter, here. Everywhere you go your progress will be recorded, as is already done with car tag readers, and the cards and money in your wallet will be recorded along with your gun, ammo, pocket knife, and anything else.


4 posted on 07/11/2015 10:24:46 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, “[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly ...


5 posted on 07/11/2015 10:26:33 AM PDT by Dogbert41 (All the days of my life were written in your book before there was one of them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

I predict a well selling brand of clothing that reflects all radar...


6 posted on 07/11/2015 10:33:39 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh
The privacy concerns caused by many detection devices are minimal in this case, Nikolova said, because the frequency range used isn't high enough to generate an image of the person.

I see, so it in no way amounts to an illegal search, how will this be different from when police used FLIR to identify homes with marijuana operations and the courts threw the case out?

8 posted on 07/11/2015 10:36:01 AM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

Time to drag out the tin-foil..........condom. Give’em a thrill.


10 posted on 07/11/2015 10:47:58 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

I doubt it could detect the type of IED I carry at times. Intra Esophagus Device, AKA Bean Burrito. While it can be detected at ranges of over 3 meters indoors, pinpointing the source is difficult.


11 posted on 07/11/2015 10:49:54 AM PDT by USMCPOP (Father of LCpl. Karl Linn, KIA 1/26/2005 Al Haqlaniyah, Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

State lawmakers want gun-shaped phone holders banned

http://blogs.mprnews.org/capitol-view/2015/07/state-lawmakers-want-gun-shaped-phone-holders-banned/

you could just wear this and make libtards wet themselves.


14 posted on 07/11/2015 2:14:59 PM PDT by TurboZamboni (Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.-JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson