Posted on 07/09/2015 12:21:17 PM PDT by Kaslin
RUSH: Have you heard this? By the way, it's true. It is being said that gay marriage is superior to heterosexual marriage. I can't believe we're even using language that signifies the difference, but, anyways, we have to.
The militant gay community says that gay marriage is superior because they get to pick their children via adoption. Therefore, they -- having chosen the exact kind of child they want-- have a much better chance at raising that child than a hetero couple who simply have to deal with whatever the sperm and the egg produce. Do not doubt me on this. There is a movement on -- subtle and quiet though it may be -- that touts that the gay lifestyle is more superior and enlightened.
It features a higher degree of awareness and sensitivity, and that gay marriage itself is superior to standard, same-old, heterosexual marriage. In part, it's because gay couples get to choose the children that they will raise, and heterosexual couples are "stuck" with whatever they end up producing. (interruption) You're frowning at me, which means you have not seen this. (interruption) They know... (interruption) They know exactly what it sounds like and they're touting it.
I don't even know if you would find this if you would Google it. You might if you Googled it. You'll find it. It's there. I mean I ran across it. I'm not making this up out of whole cloth. It's there, and it's not something that they're leading with. It's what they believe internally and it's what guides their treatment of everybody else. It's now a superior lifestyle, a supremacy lifestyle.
(Excerpt) Read more at rushlimbaugh.com ...
I meant “many” but then again “meany” works.
“Do I tell my wife that her lesbian daughter cannot bring a new granddaughter for a visit into our house?”
No, tell her that the granddaughter can come for a visit but not the lesbian daughter. The granddaughter is helpless and did not choose to create the situation.
How many children are they going to produce?
Meaning how many children are two lesbians going to produce? None, of course. If you mean how many are they going to adopt or how many might they produce with turkey baster insemination I have no idea.
True.
Straights don’t need gays, but gays can’t continue the existence of society without straights.
There’s just no escaping natural law.
57.
There is no such thing as a homo marriage.
They can call whatever the he11 they're doing whatever they want. It'still not a marriage.
Putting a bunch of feathers in my pocket doesn't make me a bird.
Homosexuals have terrible relationships. Their mental illness causes them to make lousy decisions like sodomizing anything that will let them. Being the needy people they are they also seek attention from whomever will give it to them.
The claim is that they “choose” their children and don’t take the chance on haphazard genetics. So, that means the “undesirable” children are not adopted by gays. Only the most “pure” genetically bred.
Homosexuals don’t know genetics. If they did, they know they cannot reproduce.
Exactly! Why take a perfectly wonderful word and apply it to a perversion?
Michaelson cited a 2013 study finding that “about half of gay marriages surveyed . . . [are] not strictly monogamous.” He called this fact “well-known in the gay community,” adding that “we assume it’s more like three-quarters” that are not monogamous. They are, to cite a now-popular phrase, “monagam-ish.”
I am throwing up in my mouth.
Homos suck.
I believe you are referring to Obama’s count of the states, in which case 57 is actually in error. I watched that clip several times and he says he has been in, he thinks, 57 states and has one more to go to but his people would not let him go to Alaska or Hawaii. That actually adds up to 60. No matter, there is enough IDIOCRACY going on for 57 or even 60 states to each have their share.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
Homos, like fascists of all kinds, will never be happy with ‘equal’. They come from a class of human that seeks to dominate.
Actually there is. Google Homosexual Manifesto. It makes clear that its adherents consider their lifestyle superior in every respect to heterosexuals.
Learn to write what you mean so you can mean what you write.
That does not work either. One’s child must remain one’s child regardless the transgression. If the Prodigal’s father can long for and celebrate his son’s return so must we be in constant prayer for our children who have gone astray.
Never, never, never close the door on your child. It is the burden and the blessing of parenthood to provide the kind of unrequited love our Father has for us.
In so doing do not assume you must accept the sin of the child. You must not. Hate the sin and make your hatred clear. Love the child and make that even clearer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.