Skip to comments.
Homosexuality Has No Genetic Cause
BARBWIRE.com ^
| Septemer 4, 2014
| Jonathon Moseley
Posted on 07/09/2015 6:47:42 AM PDT by Moseley
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
To: Moseley
Why’d you leave out my favorite, redheads?
61
posted on
07/09/2015 10:12:04 AM PDT
by
chesley
(Obama -- Muslim or dhimmi? And does it matter?)
To: Moseley
But if there is a genetic predisposition, why isn't the genetic basis extinct already?
No, it wouldn't necessarily. There are many genetic conditions that result in failed offspring or infertility. Some are mutations, some are recessive genes that require rare combinations to occur. Even if a homosexual gene completely prevented children (gays still have normal sex sometimes), it can still make it through generations of genetic passing-on. Quick google search:
Genetic Causes of Female Infertility
Y chromosome infertility
To: The_Reader_David
Psychopathy seems to be inborn, but we do not therefore decide that the behavior of psychopaths -- lying, cheating, stealing and murder -- is morally neutral or to be "celebrated What about the Clintons?
63
posted on
07/09/2015 10:13:54 AM PDT
by
chesley
(Obama -- Muslim or dhimmi? And does it matter?)
To: Albion Wilde
When did she develop her ugly soul?
64
posted on
07/09/2015 10:17:05 AM PDT
by
chesley
(Obama -- Muslim or dhimmi? And does it matter?)
To: annieokie
A “homosexual gene” also flies in the face of those who believe in evolution, since it would be a disastrous “trait” in the scheme of that theory which requires huge amounts of generations to work.
65
posted on
07/09/2015 10:36:04 AM PDT
by
left that other site
(You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
To: left that other site
I would call this CHECK MATE........., but I'm sure some clever young QUEER scientist will find a way around all this Factual nonsense.............
I'm am going to use the term QUEER and not the newer versions of the same........just because they are ODDish.
To: Moseley
There was a family in my hometown that had a set of identical twin boys. These boys were raised from birth in a Christian home. Mother and Father are still married to this day. The family went to the same church as my family and I was around these twin boys frequently. It was apparent from my earliest awareness that one of the boys was a boy in every sense I was and the other was quite effeminate. In addition to effeminate behaviors, he had physical features that were more feminine like musculature, facial bones, etc.
Long story short, this experience has led me to believe there is something genetic or gestational that leads to homosexuality. Guess no one knows for sure, thus the ongoing debate.
67
posted on
07/09/2015 11:05:38 AM PDT
by
IamConservative
(There is no greater threat to our freedoms than Bipartisanship.)
To: IamConservative
I can remember several children, a girl and a boy who went to elementary school with my daughter. They both grew up to be homosexual and it was obvious from about the 3 rd or 4 th grade.
68
posted on
07/09/2015 11:11:21 AM PDT
by
Ditter
( God Bless Texas!)
To: AppyPappy
To: IamConservative
I know a gentleman about my age who has a number of sisters and two brothers. The gentleman is heterosexual, having been married for nearly 50 years and having a heterosexual son and daughter. His two brothers, however, are homosexual. The two of them have been in their relationships for 30 years (+/-). Having two homosexual brothers must have cause some considerable familial stress along the way.
To: allendale
No use doubling down on a badly chosen metaphor.
71
posted on
07/09/2015 11:56:51 AM PDT
by
Albion Wilde
(When the left says justice, it means power. -- Daniel Greenfield)
To: Moseley
The fact that scientists cannot find a heterosexual gene does not prove it is a choice.
72
posted on
07/09/2015 12:20:57 PM PDT
by
csmusaret
(Will remove Obama-Biden bumperstickers for $10)
To: annieokie
“CHECKMATE” hahaha!
Good One.
73
posted on
07/09/2015 12:57:59 PM PDT
by
left that other site
(You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
To: Ransomed
Yes it is possible. And at all stages it should not be encouraged.
Agreed.
74
posted on
07/09/2015 1:22:20 PM PDT
by
vpintheak
(Call the left what they are - regressive control-freaks)
To: Moseley
Don’t quit your day job.
People with genetic defects fail to procreate all the time and yet those defects continue for thousands of years.
One obvious example: Down’s Syndrome.
You have proven nothing.
75
posted on
07/09/2015 2:26:56 PM PDT
by
ConstantSkeptic
(Be careful about preconceptions)
To: AppyPappy
Now homos are talking out of the other side of their mouths, they are saying that sexuality is “fluid”. They used that homosexuality is a born trait canard to fool the gullible, now that they have the gullible public in the palm of their hand, they can go on to the next step. Eventually they will breakdown all boundaries which is what they wanted from the beginning. They are insane and they want no boundaries.
To: Vigilanteman
Leftist just love their genocides but then they act like people are just bugs to be stamped on. Such snobs, you can see it especially when they are trying to cover it up by acting like they are the most compassionate people on earth. They do protest too much, must be hiding something.
To: G Larry
Psychologist actually used to do studies and collect data on patients on homosexuality and other things. Now it is about doing the politically correct thing or keep you mouth shut. Whether it is homosexuality or global warming everything that can be politicized will be politicized.
To: Moseley
Twin studies have show that for years.
To: Albion Wilde
"Because of the social pressure to get married to the opposite sex mentioned above.
But regardless of being married, the definition of homosexuality is reduced or no interest in sex with the opposite sex -- reproductive sex.
Without the social pressure to get married, a homosexual gene would be extinct in only 1, 2, or 3 generations.
With the social pressure to get married in a straight marriage,
1) Homosexuality would ONLY persist in societies that had the social pressure to marry.
2) Societies where there was no social pressure would have no homosexuals today. All homosexuals would be extinct in those cultures.
3) In societies with a social pressure to marry, anyone carrying a homosexuality gene would have FEWER children than normal -- in periods of history of high mortality rate for infants, children, and adults -- and homosexuality would be extinct in maybe 500 to 1,000 years.
Since we hear references to homosexuality 3,000 to 3,500 years ago, today there should be no homosexuals anywhere on planet Earth... if there were a genetic basis for it.
80
posted on
07/10/2015 9:24:50 AM PDT
by
Moseley
(http://www.MoseleyComments.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson