Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Qwackertoo

>>and Libs will tell you the Labor Participation Rate includes 98 year olds. Where do they come up with this carp?<<

First, I’m no liberal. I just really detest this 100 million Americans aren’t working b.s. because that number (usually it’s 90+ million, by the way) includes every retiree, college student, and non-working spouse in the country, which is inane.

The Labor Participation Rate doesn’t include the elderly retired, however, and is a decent portrayal of the abysmal labor market since 2009. The reported unemployment rate is 5.3% only because so many people have either quit looking for jobs because they can’t find one or, more likely, are being paid enough welfare that they don’t want to look for jobs anymore.

A better way to describe what’s going on would be to say that 7 million people are unemployed and looking for work, while 10 million more would be working if it made sense for them to get a job, but they either can’t find one or don’t want to give up their welfare benefits. (I made up the numbers, but they probably aren’t too far off.)


48 posted on 07/07/2015 9:37:05 AM PDT by Norseman (Defund the Left....completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Norseman

I usually hear 92-93 million. Whats another 7-8 million?


49 posted on 07/07/2015 9:40:40 AM PDT by Qwackertoo (Worst 8 years ever, First Affirmative Action President, I hope those who did this to us SUFFER MOST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson