Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
So then can we put to rest your constant criticism of the Union for accepting the war and fighting it over a banged-up fort and zero casualties?

No. Their response was disproportionate. It is as if a woman slaps her husband, and he beats her face in with his fists. It was an excessive overreaction.

Because you freely admit that the Confederate reason for initiating the war was even less justified than that.

It was most definitely a blunder. Even Fidel Castro knew better than to make that stupid move. They should have just swallowed their pride and lived with it, and just kept bugging Lincoln to turn it over to them.

289 posted on 07/09/2015 10:52:52 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
No. Their response was disproportionate.

And the Confederate action of bombarding Sumter to rubble? Are you willing to say that was far more disproportionate to any provocation the South could name?

It is as if a woman slaps her husband, and he beats her face in with his fists. It was an excessive overreaction.

A simplistic and somewhat inaccurate analogy. It would be more like the wife took several shots at her husband and he got his gun and fired back. Would you call that an excessive overreaction?

It was most definitely a blunder.

Never mind what the South should have done, was what they did do justified? Did the actions the garrison at Sumter took justify being bombarded into surrender? Or was it an excessive overraction on the Confederacy's part?

294 posted on 07/09/2015 11:10:36 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson