Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
Oh, I dunno, maybe because that is what the facts of history amply demonstrate?

But we're not talking about the facts of history. We're talking about inalienable, self-evident rights.

What possible kernel of evidence do you have that the Declaration was intended by it's authors and signatories to apply to slaves?

Hey, Justice Taney! Lookin' good!

246 posted on 07/07/2015 3:42:26 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("The rat always knows when he's in with weasels."--Tom Waits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]


To: Bubba Ho-Tep
But we're not talking about the facts of history. We're talking about inalienable, self-evident rights.

And this is where you try to torture an incorrect meaning out of words instead of comprehending them in the context in which they were intended.

It's the "Living Constitution" methodology applied to the Declaration.

It is a form of deliberate lying. You are lying, and you are perfectly content to continue doing so.

259 posted on 07/07/2015 3:57:08 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson