Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rockrr
That circumstance did not exist in 1860. No armies were marching into their towns and seizing their citizens or their property. There was no moral or legal justification for quitting the union. Being angry isn’t justification.

I say "destructive of these ends" is entirely in the eyes of the beholder.

I personally think the Supreme Court's rulings on Roe, on Kelo, on Wickard, Obamacare and on Gay Marriage are all destructive of these ends, and in my opinion ought to be grounds for separation.

Obviously you feel these are all acceptable aspects of our governance, and you will want to insure that I am forced to comply with them.

Right? :)

223 posted on 07/07/2015 2:48:36 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

No you are deliberately, obdurately wrong.


251 posted on 07/07/2015 3:51:13 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson