Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan
Well, no. Because if northerners had insisted on abolition as a condition of Union, there would have been no Union.

Ah, you got the joke. Glad someone did. :)

Everybody believed it would just fade away. So they simply let the sleeping dog lie, on the theory he would just die in his sleep.

It would have but for Massachusetts Yankee Eli Whitney. He flipped the profitability equation.

Had he not made it so economically viable, it would likely have succumbed to the social and moral forces that were sweeping it away elsewhere.

160 posted on 07/07/2015 11:23:06 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

Agreed.

See, we can agree on things. :)


163 posted on 07/07/2015 11:39:12 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp

To be fair, Whitney wasn’t trying to rescue slavery. In fact, if I remember correctly, he thought his invention would help end slavery because it so greatly reduced the amount of labor needed to clean seeds out of cotton.

Best laid plans and all that...


164 posted on 07/07/2015 11:41:03 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson