Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ziravan

They chose what seemed like a reasonable path at the time. They restricted importing slaves by ship in 1794, just 6 years after the Constitution was ratified.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave_Trade_Act_of_1794

After 20 years, importing slaves was banned.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_Prohibiting_Importation_of_Slaves

It was reasonably thought these measures would lead to an end of slavery without needing a war. That proved to be a false hope, but it was a reasonable approach.


139 posted on 07/07/2015 9:42:14 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (Can you remember what America was like in 2004?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers
They restricted importing slaves by ship in 1794, just 6 years after the Constitution was ratified.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave_Trade_Act_of_1794

After 20 years, importing slaves was banned.

Hard to square that act with the Constitutional provision prohibiting such acts. I guess they were ignoring it back then too.

It was reasonably thought these measures would lead to an end of slavery without needing a war. That proved to be a false hope, but it was a reasonable approach.

Once again, blame Eli Whitney who made it profitable.

173 posted on 07/07/2015 12:11:26 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson