Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan
So there is actually a better case that the South seceded because they didn’t get the expansion of federal power they wanted.

You mean they took the choice of having even less Federal power? How does that make any sense?

105 posted on 07/07/2015 8:22:51 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

In 1860 southern Democrats insisted on a pledge in their party platform that a Federal Slave Code protecting slave property would be imposed by Congress on all territories, and that federal troops would be used if necessary to enforce it.

The idea being to get around Douglas and his notion that territories in could exclude slavery by simply refusing to enforce it. Southern Democrats insisted this out be removed and that the Democratic Party agree to actively support the expansion of slavery. This would of course be an expansion of federal power.

Northern Democrats refused, and southern Democrats walked out of the convention, twice. Guaranteeing Lincoln’s election and therefore secession.


112 posted on 07/07/2015 8:45:27 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson