He misses an important point. The important point he misses is that we have changed the definition of marriage, and the Supreme Court has said that the previous definition violated the constitutional rights of people who wanted to change the definition of marriage.
Now that we have established that the definition of marriage can be changed, what will stop it from being changed again???
Yes. Given the “reasoning” of our idiot Supremes, there is no logical reason that “marriage” couldn’t be between absolutely anything at all.
- Two men and five women
- a man and his dog
- a lady and her parrot
- the Minnesota Vikings
- you and yourself
- you and the spirit of somebody who died a century ago
And on and on. This decision to destroy marriage was insane and the whole court should be impeached and expelled.