[HarleyD]

I did not see post #68 on Hus' alleged heresies as it was not address to me. Neither did you probably see my post #92 on how Hus (based on Fudge's work) was not allowed to address his accussers nor was it considered a legal trial as there was no pope who resided over the proceedings (among other things) since I did not address you in on that post.

I did noticed that one of Hus' heresy charges that you posted was that he did not believe the pope to be Peter's successor. This brings an interesting question to mind. Since many of us Protestants here do not believe that the pope is Peter's successor, does that mean we are heretics worthy of burning at the stake?

[dangus]

>> Since many of us Protestants here do not believe that the pope is Peter’s successor, does that mean we are heretics worthy of burning at the stake? <<

You say you hadn’t seen post #68. Have you still not read it? If so, how could you ask such a question? How about post #100?