Wall down the center isn’t walling it off.
My point is that that particular issue always gets ignored
and sometimes folks who bring it up.. or perhaps express
it poorly.. get tarred with the “anti-fence” brush.
I guess you were referring to that long-ass bridge over
lake Pontchartrain just across the border to Louisiana
on I-10.. sure enough, it could be done.
Probably end up being a pretty cool feature, I’d even be proud to participate and score me an operator job.
But a “fence” it would not be.
Yup, thats the one. I couldn’t think of the name.
No it isn’t a fence per se but whay I was getting at was that the texh that built it is no different that a fence in the Rio. Build that road vertically instead of horizontally and there it is.
I get what you’re saying. Many people do indeed say yea or nay without ever thinking about the how involved. My whole thing on that is that it can be done. Knowing that it can is then off the table and into the realm of ‘should’ it be done.
In almost every case I have argued with people on the fence issue they don’t want to deal with ‘should’ because as long as they say ‘can’t’ they never have to justify NOT building it bases on the pros or cons there. And thats why I believe that most people that are vehemently opposed are in fact pro illegal. Once people accept that we CAN, thn what is their basis to oppose it that does not automatically benefit illegals? They have to go into some very liberal backed arguments like the environment and that pretty much exposes their real intentions.
Sure, no one wants to look at a fence. Personally I don’t care about their asthetic desires when people are dying and our money is going to benefit invaders. Nor should a relative handful of landowners get to make the call on land they don’t even own anyway.