Is sex with pre-pubescent children a part of Sharia Law or just a social convention among the muslim invaders of once-great Britain?
This is about Rotherham, not ‘protecting children’.
One reason Sharia endorses sex with children is because it has not changed since the 11th century.
Also, islam teaches men to impregnate the females of their enemies because those children are considered muslims.
It is a way of “spreading the faith”.
AFAIK, all the children abused in Rotherham were post-pubescent. If you have information to the contrary, I’d be interested in seeing it.
It may be relevant that girls today seem to be entering puberty much younger than in the past.