“Most of what I have presented, if you can read is factual.”
BS, you insert your half-baked theories into every comment. For example, painting this guy falsely as a “leading vaccine researcher”, or being unable to resist referring to autism as “vaccine-linked autism”, without a shred of evidence.
You are correct. His status as a leading researcher is “debatable” and “questionable”. But that certainly was not the focus of my post.