Posted on 06/27/2015 11:29:40 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
“How many vaccine-questioning docs, with full patient books, have killed themselves recently?...”
Well considering the tiny sample size you’re working with, I don’t think you’re likely to get any statistically significant data.
Oh yeah I missed that part haha I read it 3 times and missed he was found in the river
It is settled early 20th century science. Vaccines are primitive and so harmful their own makers don’t stand behind them.
The newest science says the variation in the bacterial biome inside each baby and child, plus their own individual genetics, will determine which children will be able to tolerate a given vaccine on a given day and which will suffer permanent injury or death. Right now we are not able to test for this important info but we will be able to, soon.
For instance, the fudged stats on the MMR vaccine lied to cover up that African American babies vaccinated under three years of age have a tripled risk of autism from that shot. A whistleblower scientist has testified to that falsehood yet they don’t publish it.
How many Californian kids will be damaged or killed by being forced to take all the shots before they can enter daycare?
I agree with you! I forgot to use the sarcasm tag.
“Settled Science” is the language of charlatans.
Or rather than a guilty conscience he knew what that Federal search warrant was going to turn up and realized it was game over.
Helping autistic kids is harm? I think Obama and Holdren would agree with you.
So a doctor who is personally impacted by vaccine induced autism cannot be objective? You have nothing valuable to add, so go drink a beer in your doublewide by the river...
Brilliant.
That one sounds worth considering. Cut down on the welfare pregnancies if you removed the profit motive.
As for the forced sterilizations - I would have to see the criteria first. Three kids supported by the taxpayers = sterilization sounds reasonable.
I lol’d at the graphic.
“So a doctor who is personally impacted by vaccine induced autism cannot be objective?”
Not bloody likely if it killed two of his children.
“You have nothing valuable to add, so go drink a beer in your doublewide by the river...”
Actually, it’s the person who starts tossing ad hominems that has nothing to add.
“For instance, the fudged stats on the MMR vaccine lied to cover up that African American babies vaccinated under three years of age have a tripled risk of autism from that shot.”
Wrong. They found a correlation. Correlation does not equal causation. That is a very basic principle of logic.
You sit and mock while presenting no factual or circumstantial evidence. Some personal attacks are earned.
You have no leg to stand on when it comes to demanding evidence, all you do is push conspiracy nonsense.
Could be that too. Actually, probably more likely than that he suddenly developed a conscience after ripping sick people off for so many years.
Most of what I have presented, if you can read is factual. The death of the Doctor may be conspiratorial, but the family believes it. So where does that leave you? A supporter of forced vaccinations? A supporter of John Holdren? With every fiber of my being I will fight the Sodomites and people like you!
Really,Thanks Jan_Sobieski
http://onlyway.com/2015/02/anti-vaccine-dr-moulden-dead-murdered/
The left moves in mysterious ways. Nothing, and I mean NOTHING, can be taken at face value in this country any more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.