Posted on 06/27/2015 11:11:04 AM PDT by jazusamo
There is renewed energy on Capitol Hill to lift the Defense Department's ban on transgender troops.
Lawmakers view recent steps by the Pentagon and some of the armed services to expand protections for gay and lesbian troops as an opportunity to do away with the decades-old prohibition on allowing transgender troops to serve openly.
They are also taking note of other societal changes in calling for the ban on service by transgender trips to be lifted. “In politics, I think it’s always appropriate to take advantage of timing. Whether it’s taking down the Confederate flag or creating equality in the military for transgender persons,” said Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.).
She plans to introduce legislation next month that calls on the Pentagon to immediately grant anti-discrimination protection for all service members, and their dependents, who identify as transgender.
The bill, which is still being drafted, would also direct the Defense secretary to hammer out new policies for transgender troops, from regulations about their uniforms to what treatments would be covered under Tricare, the military's healthcare system.
Separately, Rep. Mike Honda (D-Calif.) on Thursday lead a group of nearly 20 House members in a letter to Defense Secretary Ashton Carter that urged him to do away with the policy.
“People should be evaluated on performance, not gender," Honda, who has a transgender granddaughter, said in a statement
Any effort to do away with the prohibition is likely to face stiff resistance in a GOP-controlled Congress.
House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mac Thornberry (R-Texas) has said the decision on the ban should be left to the Pentagon.
The department “needs to look at a variety of policies. As long as they look at it objectively, based on what’s best for the security interests of the country, then we’ll oversee or review what they do,” he told The Hill.
“When there’s a sense that there’s some extraneous social or political agenda … people get concerned,” Thornberry added.
Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John McCain (R-Ariz.) struck a similar chord.
“The administration policy should always be a basis for our discussion,” he said.
Transgender activists say that, while they are heartened by the increased focus on the issue, they aren’t about to pin their hopes on Capitol Hill.
They note that, while lawmakers led the charge in the 2011 repeal of "Don’t ask, don’t tell,” the Clinton-era law that prohibited gay and lesbian people from serving openly in the military, the transgender ban is department-level policy.
“Everyone in advocacy believes this needs to be a Pentagon thing,” said Mara Keisling, executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality. She added that the legislative push could wind up being an “education and advocacy tool.”
She pointed to recent moves by the DOD, as well as the Air Force and Army to expand protections for LGBT service members, as evidence that many Pentagon leaders can “feel the dominoes falling.”
Hopes for lifting the ban grew days after Carter took office and signaled that a person's gender identity shouldn’t factor into if he or she can serve in the armed forces.
“I don't think anything but their suitability for service should preclude them,” he said.
The White House quickly endorsed Carter’s remarks.
“The president agrees with the sentiment that all Americans who are qualified to serve should be able to serve,” White House press secretary Josh Earnest said.
Earlier this month Carter announced sexual orientation would be added to the military's anti-discrimination policy.
And just last week, the White House hosted a handful of transgender service members and veterans at its gay pride event.
Keisling said the comments, along with last week’s event, show that there's “an understanding in the administration that it’s all right with the civilian powers that be to end the ban.”
“The Pentagon’s a trickier place than that, however,” she added.
A DOD spokesman said there is “no ongoing review to specifically address the Department's transgender policy.”
However, in February, the Pentagon started a “routine, periodic review” of its medical guidelines that specifically prohibit service by transgender people, he added. The assessment, last conducted in 2011, is slated to wrap up some time next year.
“My sense is that all eyes are on the secretary of Defense. He’s the center of gravity on this,” said Aaron Belkin, director of the Palm Center.
He predicted that Carter ultimately would decide to trash the prohibition, noting that the influential American Medical Association recently concluded there is “no medically valid reason” to keep transgender persons out of the military.
Both he and Keisling said it was “inevitable” that the ban would be lifted, though neither would hazard to guess when it might happen.
For her part, Speier isn’t willing to sit back and wait for the DOD to act.
“I don’t necessarily think one branch of government has the lock on good policy,” said Speier, who has a transgender nephew.
She said her staff has been in contact with two Senate offices about introducing a companion bill in that chamber, though she declined to identify them.
“The time is right, so let’s do what the right thing is," Speier said.
Unit cohesiveness is one of the most powerful forces in combat.
Looks like our Pentagon Chair Polishers, in their rush to appease Obama, have thrown that to the winds in pursuit of promotions and pensions.
What are they laughing at???....at how ridiculous they look?
Can’t stop laughing. These people are freaks!
I thought the military was being downsized...why do we want to recruit/keep people who have serious mental health/identity issues?
You’re correct in my view and the perfumed prince’s are already moving that direction.
Your question strikes at the very heart of the matter, my FRiend.
Transgenderism reflects people with a definite mental disorder/illness.
Coming soon:
Trans-species.
Not so long ago most people had the common sense to understand that homosexuals, cross dressers and other sexual deviates were just sick people who had their brains addled somewhere along the line.
They were treated as the mentally ill people they really are.
Now they are foolishly celebrated as if they were elevating human existence to a higher level.
How can they expect troops to salute and respect people like that? They have no respect for themselves going out in public like that.
THe former chief psychiatrist of John Hopkins wrote an editorial in the WSJ regarding transgender people as having a mental disorder, pure and simple. They need help, not encouragement by the military in their delusion.
Put them out alone on the front line at night in a fighting hole, no comms and low on ammo, instead of serving as office pinkies for some homosexual officer back at headquarters with all the other worthless REMF's.
At this point, I hope they do it. It would kill recruitment completely. Nobody normal is going to sign up to obey some drag queen drill sergeant.
That was Dr. Paul R. McHugh and he’s written several great articles on the subject and doesn’t beat around the bush.
The military should be screaming bloody murder about this move to legitimize them but the current leaders are kowtowing to 0bama.
cocksuckers to the front
pussymunchers to the front
CHARGE
cocksuckers to the front
pussymunchers to the front
CHARGE
Calling Merv Griffin.
Forward the LGBT Brigade!
Allowing trannies is a done deal. The next step is that the military will be paying for the surgeries of active duty and the VA will be paying for veterans. Which means: you and me.
With sadness I agree.
I’m not surprised I assure you. In the not too distant future you’ll actually have a male general at the Pentagon introducing his husband. Oh! Wait a minute. That’s already happened. But you will see a male officer wearing heels, hose and a garter belt with a blond wig. There’s no reason whatsoever in Obama’s world why this can’t happen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.