Words taken out of context by Lewis and embedded in a pitiful argument.
Kelly makes it clear at time 2:16 the scope is limited to ‘limiting’ the overreach of the Federal Government; any expansion of federal power is out of scope.
Lewis makes the failed plea that the remedy is to stop electing those that won’t uphold the Constitution. Pitiful to watch this ‘remedy’ flashed on his subpar presentation.
Lewis’ ‘remedy’ plea is no remedy at all. By making this plea Lewis reveals an intellectual deficiency in his failure to trace the origins of the federal overreach to the year 1913 when the flawed 17th Amendment was passed.
Because Lewis lacks the intellectual acumen to understand the effects of momentous deleterious events of history, his thinking follows a path that leads to error upon error in direction. To save his self-inflated pride he picks up a substandard defense that one must preserve the harm done by electing officials to continue following the tortuous path that has caused most of the harm.
Lewis’ presentation makes for a pitiful exposition; not worthy of any categorization other than garbage.
If that’s the best you got, you better prepare for the coming Article V groundswell that has been forming this year and now has a critical boost from the events of last week.