[mojito]

He'd make more of a splash by calling the institution he is in, illegitimate

I think he did, if you read this in conjunction with the Obamacare decision yesterday. He has said that the court has grossly violated the Constitution in fundamental ways as to amount to a kind of tyranny. He can't, as a sitting justice, come right out and call for nullification, but those are the essence of his words.

[Cboldt]

-- He can't, as a sitting justice, come right out and call for nullification, but those are the essence of his words. --

Calling for nullification is what I meant by saying "that" would make more of a splash. Otherwise, his rhetoric is typical of dissents, so typical that it's boilerplate by now.

[Mouton]

Ironic you mention nullification with the current debate on removing Jackson from the $20. Had not Jackson come down on the side of the feds in the arguments surrounding the tariffs on the early 1800’s which arguments were leading to secession as early as 1830, nullification would have taken hold. IMO, once that principle was destroyed, we no longer had a representative central government, we had a burgeoning overbearing central government which on the current trajectory by whom is a favorite to be nominated by both parties, a semi monarchy.

[TheDon]

I think he did, if you read this in conjunction with the Obamacare decision yesterday. He has said that the court has grossly violated the Constitution in fundamental ways as to amount to a kind of tyranny. He can't, as a sitting justice, come right out and call for nullification, but those are the essence of his words.

Response from the Republican controlled Congress? ....

Bueller? Bueller?