Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Buckeye McFrog

I’d go one step further and have Thomas and Alito resign with Scalia at the same time. Their appointed replacements would not be accepted by the public, even if they are appointed by Congress.

Walking off of the court mid-game due to poor refereeing and cheating by the other team. Historically it would be viewed as resigning with honor and would perhaps start some sort of legal civil war.

Perhaps it will only happen in one of those alternate history books....


57 posted on 06/26/2015 8:40:41 AM PDT by Textide (Lord, grant that I may always be right, for thou knowest I am hard to turn. ~ Scotch-Irish prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Textide
The court cares not if the decisions are accepted by the public. As long as the decisions are followed by the government actors, all is well in legal-land.

Law is about brute force, not about logic.

115 posted on 06/26/2015 9:12:15 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: Textide

Bad idea! Justice James Clark McReynolds resigned (took senior status) in 1941 when he was the very last of the great Four Horsemen (Vandevanter, Butler and Sutherland had been the others) on the SCOTUS. His resignation did not roll back the New Deal.


195 posted on 06/26/2015 12:07:46 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline: Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society/Rack 'em Danno!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson