Posted on 06/26/2015 7:01:22 AM PDT by markomalley
Ruling just came out 5-4
nor interestingYea that was the point, not interesting, to you drugboy.
Correct. Eliminate government from it entirely. Contract between parties, religious ceremonies at the Church.
Stop trying to hijack the thread...
Go start your own thread on the evils of alcohol.
One trick pony, any mention of drugs on this forum is like dangling a goat in front of a hungry animal.
So to clarify, you're okay with the slavery as a reason to leave so long as you go through a pomp and circumstances ceremony to make it look pretty?
Since I'm not the one claiming that some states have no rights while other states do then I don't think I'm the one defending tyranny.
I would point out that this is a straw man argument, but I have a feeling you don't grasp such complex concepts.
I'll simplify for you. I made no remark even resembling that assertion.
No not alcohol. And not heroin.
I look forward to the political campaigns where candidates run on that platform and put their ideas to the voters.
I reply to interesting posts on all sorts of topics (see below) - your posts simply aren’t interesting.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/gop/3303928/posts?page=70#70
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3304013/posts?page=172#172
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3303620/posts?page=71#71
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3303671/posts?page=30#30
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3303276/posts?page=35#35
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3303291/posts?page=58#58
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3302789/posts?page=32#32
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3302881/posts?page=27#27
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3302670/posts?page=19#19
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3302674/posts?page=3#3
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3302272/posts?page=17#17
Berlin_Freeper introduced the subject of drugs in post #58 - go bitch at him.
No not alcohol. And not heroin.
Is that a sarcastic "yes" to my first question? If so, what's your answer to the second question?
If you're serious - why has heroin not contributed to the troubles we are facing in our country?
Your absence of contact with reality is astonishing in someone capable of cognitive thought to the extent that they can read and write.
Notice inflation has virtually doubled since Non American Citizen Odumbo has been letting his cronies play with money?
Nah, you probably didn't.
Heroin addicts don’t vote.
Alcohol has been coexisting with Western Civilization from the beginning.
LOL! Probably not.
Alcohol has been coexisting with Western Civilization from the beginning.
From which it in no way follows that alcohol is not one of the drugs whose overuse has contributed to the troubles we are facing in our country.
Berlin_Freeper introduced the subject of drugs in post #58 - go bitch at him.
And don't forget to chastise the fellows arguing about the Civil War.
Berlin_Freeper introduced the subject of drugs in post #58 - go bitch at him.I was on topic in relation to the homosexual agenda. ConservingFreedom Lmao) Trolls me on many of the anti-drug posts I make and couldn’t are less about the thread topic.
He is a sick retread troll, don’t expect a decent response from him(?) unless you post something pro-drugs.
You wish you were that interesting.
If you want to describe taking steps to ensure a peaceful separation as "make it look pretty" then yeah.
I would point out that this is a straw man argument, but I have a feeling you don't grasp such complex concepts.
Oh I understand the concept. It's your arguments that I'm having problems finding sense in.
I'll simplify for you. I made no remark even resembling that assertion.
Sure you did. In your world it was perfectly fine for several states to walk out of the union and their resposnibility for obligations and with any federal property they could get their hands on and the remaining state had no rights or protections in the matter, but could only sit and take it. Now you claimed that wasn't what happened but you are completely wrong. The Southern states walked out. They claimed that they were out of the union and were forming their own country. They did not pay for their fair share of the debt before leaving, they left it to the other states. They did not pay for the forts and armories and courthouses and mints that they took, they just took them. And in your world it was their right to do all that. So then clearly you are also saying that the remaining states had no rights in the matter. All they could do was accept it. You are proven wrong by your own words.
But, you bleat, the Southern states offered to pay for Sumter. Even if that was a serious offer, it still does not change the fact that there was no offer to pay for obligations walked away from or other property seized. So we're back to the fact that you think the Southern state had the right to do that and the other states had no rights in the matter. In your Orwellian world you would have us believe that all states are equal, but some are more equal than others. So please don't deny that's been your position all along.
So you think it’s delusional to want to see the idea of secession that you advance actually put to the people? How do you see it proceeding then?
Not interesting?
You referred to a comment I made to someone other than yourself from days ago... creepy-drug-weirdo-stalker-boy. Lol!
You hijacked this thread and my minutes long enough, Retread Troll.
Seek help for yourself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.