If an atheist president would adhere strictly to the Constitution, I’d have no problem with him being there. All we want are the freedoms that have been promised to us — the ones that are being wiped out every day. If an atheist president would protect the freedoms, that would be fine. He has a right to be an atheist; that’s what America promises, and I respect that. (He’ll burn in hell, but that’s his choice.) By the same token, I have a right to be a Christian and worhip freely.
I’d rather have an atheist president who protects the Constitution than a Baptist president who was wishy-washy on the Constitution.
If indeed it’s true that an atheist is “three-fourths conquered” by Marxism as Skousen asserts Marxists themselves believe, then such an atheist would be a rare fellow. To be an atheist, especially versus agnostic, seems to require a certain degree of contempt for anyone who does believe in God, almost by definition.