Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coronal

I guess that First Amendment right to petition is so much toilet paper, eh?


9 posted on 06/24/2015 8:22:15 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SoFloFreeper

first stab at the 1st amendment, beyond religious grounds?


12 posted on 06/24/2015 8:53:51 AM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
Very good point. Let's be clear, this is about the stupidest thing I have seen in a long time. However, a close second is a judge denying the right to petition (if the news report is accurate). According to Judge Napolitano, "Freedom of thought, freedom of expression, freedom of association, even if generated and defined by hatred, is protected, as long as that does not produce immediate lawless violence”.

This is clearly a case of PC creep. The polite company argument of PC at our universities has now evolved into restricting first amendment rights. Following the California Judge's logic, I could not start a petition to ban flag burning because flag burning is constitutional..

15 posted on 06/24/2015 10:12:35 AM PDT by 11th Commandment ("THOSE WHO TIRE LOSE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

The First Amendment right to petition does not mean that every such petition must be placed on the ballot. As the judge noted, the result sought by proposed ballot initiative here—a law permitting/mandating killing all homosexuals—is patently unconstitutional. Refusing to place it on the ballot did not deprive the petitioner of any rights.


19 posted on 06/24/2015 1:34:23 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson