Posted on 06/24/2015 4:37:11 AM PDT by don-o
The Bandidos Motorcycle Club released a statement Monday responding to police and other accounts of the May 17 shootout at Twin Peaks that killed nine people, injured another 20 and landed 177 people in jail.
Las Vegas attorney Stephen Stubbs, who said he is representing the national club solely for the purpose of constructing and distributing the release, called the violence senseless, completely unnecessary and wrong.
Stubbs described statements made by the Waco Police Department as untrue, citing the list of weapons, which now totals 488 and could still increase, as misleadingly high.
Police have said the list of weapons found on the scene includes 151 firearms 12 of which were long guns knives, brass knuckles, batons, tomahawks, weighted weapons, a hatchet, stun guns, bats, clubs, a machete, a pipe, an ax, pepper spray and a chain.
Stubbs argued that police have intentionally left out that the reason bikers were present that day was a regional meeting for the Texas Confederation of Clubs and Independents, which he said was scheduled in Waco so that various chapters of Texas clubs could conveniently access the location.
Legal documents filed in the case say the meeting of the Region 1 Confederation of Clubs and Independents was moved from Austin to the Twin Peaks in Waco, and that nearly all of the recent Region 1 COC&I meetings had been held in Austin. The documents allege it is not common for members of any of the other 11 COC&I regions in Texas to attend a regional meeting of another area of the Texas COC&I. Many of the 177 bikers arrested in the Twin Peaks shootout were from outside Region 1.
But Stubbs contends that was specifically the purpose of holding the meeting in Waco. He added that specific speakers were invited to the meeting so that multiple regions could discuss biker-related political issues in one forum. He said that because COC&I members from across the state were expected to attend this special meeting, it was purposefully scheduled in Waco because its a central city between Austin and Dallas.
Stubbs said police have consistently released information that denigrates the Bandidos and that their false narrative is damaging to everyone involved.
Waco police Sgt. W. Patrick Swanton has said the number and variety of weapons indicates to the public that these are not (motorcycle) clubs, these are criminal gangs that came here with the intent or anticipation of violence. The Texas Department of Public Safety has classified the Bandidos as a criminal street gang.
Calls for video release
Stubbs disputes the idea Bandidos members anticipated violence that day and called on the department to release video evidence and autopsy reports so the public can see what happened for themselves.
The preliminary autopsy reports were released days after the shooting and are publicly available, but the final written reports have not been completed, officials have said.
I believe wholeheartedly that the Waco police have that information, Stubbs said, adding that he thinks officials already know which caliber bullets killed which bikers.
He added, The coroner has examined these bodies as much as hes going to examine these bodies.
Justice of the Peace W.H. Pete Peterson, who ordered the nine autopsies, said Tuesday that final autopsy results have not been returned and can take anywhere between a month to three months to return to his office.
They do a complete autopsy, and toxicology is part of it, he said. The lab work is usually what takes the longest.
He said that the Dallas County Medical Examiners Office also prioritizes their own countys cases, aside from receiving work from other non-medical examiner counties like McLennan.
It just takes time, he said.
The preliminary autopsy results, which were returned in the first few days following the shooting, show each of the nine men killed had gunshot wounds listed as the cause of death and homicide listed as the manner of death.
Several of the documents indicate where on their bodies the men were shot. For example, Daniel Raymond Boyett, 44, the only person from Waco killed in the shootout, suffered multiple gunshot wounds to his head, a preliminary autopsy document shows.
Stubbs said he thinks officials should release video, at the very least, to clear up rampant misinformation.
Video has no bias. Video is completely independent, he said. Science doesnt have a bias; its independent. We want the independent evidence out to contradict the misinformation thats been released.
Swanton has said officials sent the videos to the FBI for analysis. He said the footage likely includes images from at least one squad car dash camera, Twin Peaks restaurant surveillance cameras and a surveillance camera from the neighboring Don Carlos Mexican restaurant.
On May 20, the Tribune-Herald filed a request under Texas Public Information Act for all video from the shooting, including security surveillance from Twin Peaks and Don Carlos, as well as any dash cam or body camera footage. Waco police objected to the release of the videos and sent the request to the Texas Attorney Generals office on June 2, seeking an opinion.
The Texas Public Information Act allows governmental agencies to withhold from public disclosure certain law enforcement records if the release would interfere with the detection, investigation or prosecution of a crime.
The Attorney Generals Office has up to 45 business days to issue an opinion on whether the police department must release any videos from the shooting.
There are things that we know that we cannot talk about until trial, Swanton has said, adding the department is concerned about tainting a potential jury pool.
Stubbs responded, Either you dont want to taint the jury pool and you dont talk or you are talking and you are tainting the jury pool. You cant have it both ways. It seems to me that they are tainting the jury pool in their favor.
He added, My mama always told me that a half-truth is a whole lie.
Stubbs said that members of the Bandidos were not aggressors in the shootout and didnt start the altercation, strike first, or pull weapons first and the video footage would reflect that account. Stubbs said the majority of the Bandidos present that day took cover and that all involvement by Bandidos was in self-defense.
Its very clear why the Bandidos showed up, Stubbs said. They were there to attend a political meeting and nothing else.
Swanton did not respond to requests for comment Tuesday.
Absolutely -- it is all about breaking down the morale of the kinds of American patriots who exercise their right to free association on FR -- Jim, thank you so much for this venue. May God bless and keep you and yours.
Did ever dawn on you the Bandido's and others are lying?
Step from behind your keyboard and call this guy a liar.
You are a worthless troll.........
With the longest shelf life I have seen in a long time around here. Quite amazing, that.
I have private messages saying exactly THAT regarding the Waco threads.
Well, if there is one thing the police state jackweasels are good at it's intimidation.
I suspect though, that their efforts are not making them any friends, and makes people less likely to support their position.
We are in agreement! The Bandidos are “grateful for the job police did”.
LOL. Some of us have jobs...
Now this IS TG’s job, I suspect. I don’t think he realizes just how burned he is and that the fact he is here is yet further evidence of just how wrong things are in Waco.
“Well, if there is one thing the police state jackweasels are good at it’s intimidation.”
Posts like that are exactly why more are not on these threads.
“Now this IS TGs job, I suspect. I dont think he realizes just how burned he is and that the fact he is here is yet further evidence of just how wrong things are in Waco.”
If I am ‘burned’ for bringing out the truth about the MC gangs, then so be it.
Does the gummint send people in not just to get intel but disrupt?
When I was a freshman at UC Boulder in ‘72 there was an anti war protest in response to something Nixon had done, bombing in Loas or something. Having shoulder length hair and wire frame glasses ( I wore them for years before he did) I looked like John Lennon. By then I had a lottery number of 356 so I was pretty sure I wasn’t going no matter what happened. But I was interested to see the event on campus and hear the speakers. Speakers started out calmly enough, reciting the history of the war. I may be remembering it wrong but it seems Ellsberg himself was there speaking. Toward the end a guy in a fatigue jacket came up and asked to speak. He was unscheduled but they let him. I was back about 75 yards from the dais and listening calmly as were we all. Some 25 feet to my right were a line of Boulder PD, to keep order. I noticed a young man in civilian clothing standing with a pack in his jeans and shirt chatting with the police. Pretty soon he starts taking photos with a long lense. He was shooting individuals in the crowd. I remember thinking, we now we all have FBI files. Anyway, meanwhile, the “spontaneous” guest starts on about how he is a B-52 pilot just home and starts ranting and shouting about how our gummint is murdering thousands of peaceful Asians with indiscriminate bombing and, etc. he was getting folks pretty worked up about how we were all murders. Just as he hit “frenzy” some guy runs up and grabs the mike and screams, “enough of this BULLSH... Let’s take the overpass and shut it down. I immediately recognized the dude because not ten minutes before he had been taking pictures for our FBI files. Like Twain said, “all hearts and no brains (is a mob)”. So off everyone goes to “take the overpass”. My gf, we married 6 months later, and I followed along and I remember thinking just how stupid these people were. We were about to physically engage the police and everybody wanted to be on that bridge with only two, narrow avenues of egress. We watched the activities from a safer perspective but I never forgot how that crowd was set in motion by a guy who was clearly a gummint disrupt or.
Who knows, coulda been your dad, TG. Hell, maybe it was YOU.
“Who knows, coulda been your dad, TG. Hell, maybe it was YOU.”
I doubt it. I was patrolling HaiPhong Harbor in 72.
Not surprising, but no mention of any undercover officers. Nor is there any claim that the list is exhaustive.
How many Feds, undercovers, or confidential informants were on scene?
TG, after the “black palms in my backyard” “here in Massachusetts” “where I am an electrical engineer” who doesn’t seem to have a real firm grasp on Physics I believe you about as much as I believed that guy in ‘72 was a B-52 pilot. Sorry.
Here, I thought you were a chick.....
Good question, but we'll never know.
This stands out: The number of weapons discovered during our search of the crime scene has increased since the first release and may continue to increase. The weapon count at this point in time is at least 475 weapons. This includes 151 firearms, 12 of which were long guns.
In Texas. Where it is legal to carry guns and knives. How many were there perfectly legally? And was the bb gun they seized among the property of one Cossack, among those dangerous long guns? So many questions!
The weapons recovered include: knives, brass knuckles, batons, tomahawks, weighted weapons, a hatchet, stun guns, bats, clubs, a machete, a pipe, an ax, pepper spray, and a chain. ..... and watch chains, nail clippers, fix-all tools, and pocket knives, lots and lots of 'em.
Many of these were hastily hidden and some were found using metal detectors as they were buried beneath the grass in the dirt.
Whatever you say, bub.
But don't worry - they'll have it all sorted out in a few years and if the officers were wrong, they'll be held accountable, don't you worry. It's the only way to be fair.
When I was a freshman at UC Boulder in 72 there was an anti war protest in response to something Nixon had done, bombing in Loas or something. Having shoulder length hair and wire frame glasses ( I wore them for years before he did) I looked like John Lennon. By then I had a lottery number of 356 so I was pretty sure I wasnt going no matter what happened. But I was interested to see the event on campus and hear the speakers.
Speakers started out calmly enough, reciting the history of the war. I may be remembering it wrong but it seems Ellsberg himself was there speaking. Toward the end a guy in a fatigue jacket came up and asked to speak. He was unscheduled but they let him. I was back about 75 yards from the dais and listening calmly as were we all. Some 25 feet to my right were a line of Boulder PD, to keep order.
I noticed a young man in civilian clothing standing with a pack in his jeans and shirt chatting with the police. Pretty soon he starts taking photos with a long lens. He was shooting individuals in the crowd. I remember thinking, we now we all have FBI files.
Anyway, meanwhile, the spontaneous guest starts on about how he is a B-52 pilot just home and starts ranting and shouting about how our gummint is murdering thousands of peaceful Asians with indiscriminate bombing and, etc. he was getting folks pretty worked up about how we were all murders. Just as he hit frenzy some guy runs up and grabs the mike and screams, enough of this BULLSH... Lets take the overpass and shut it down. I immediately recognized the dude because not ten minutes before he had been taking pictures for our FBI files.
Like Twain said, all hearts and no brains (is a mob). So off everyone goes to take the overpass. My gf, we married 6 months later, and I followed along and I remember thinking just how stupid these people were. We were about to physically engage the police and everybody wanted to be on that bridge with only two, narrow avenues of egress. We watched the activities from a safer perspective but I never forgot how that crowd was set in motion by a guy who was clearly a gummint disrupt or.
Thanks for the edit. My wife usually edits me but she isn’t a FReeper.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.