So, is it the medical examiner's place to postulate facts that may or not be present in the investigation? Could she also suggest that another prisoner shoving him head first into a wall could have caused the injury? I am not saying that is what happened, but I thought it was the responsibility of the medical examiner to determine exactly what injury/illness caused death, not guess how it might have happened.
Exactly.
IF the M.E. "surmised" anything, they'll be torn to shreds by the defense attorney.
The M.E. is supposed to report "just the facts, ma'am".
If the trial is public, ala OJ, the prosecution is finished.
A stupid judge will allow "surmising". A smart judge will not allow it.
Either way, Baltimore burns to a crisp.
Hope the liberals are proud of their work here.