She is a gawdawful candidate and the Media knows that. They are cheerleaders for our continual march to the Left, and fear that Hillary could totally muck that up by imploding late in the campaign and handing the Presidency to (gulp) Scott Walker or (ack...gag) Ted Cruz.
Being more loyal to ideology than the Clintons, they are going to sink her before she sinks their movement.
Hillary was asked why her State Dept greenlit the transfer of 20% of strategic US uranium to the Russians. Clinton claimed she had no involvement..."...it wasn’t something the secretary of state did.”
On an issue of utmost national security, Hillary's statement strains credulity for these reasons:
<><> First, nine investors who profited from the uranium deal collectively donated $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.
<><> Hillary notes that “nine US government agencies signed off on that deal.”.....but she was the only US agency signoff who banked $145 million from uranium shareholders.
When Hillary was asked about the Kremlin-backed bank that paid Bill $500,000 for a single speech in Moscow, Hillary offered a blurry evasion. “It happened in terms of the support for the foundation before I was secretary of state.” Yet, the Times confirms the gargantuan fee was pocketed, “shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One.”
Plus----at the time Hillary’s State Dept was considering the Uranium One deal, Uranium One’s then-chief Ian Telfer donated $2.35 million that the Clinton foundation kept hidden.
American voters are left to ponder Hillary's involvement in strategic US uranium reserves now in Vladimir Putin's hands: She's either dangerously incompetent or deeply dishonest. (hat tip Clinton Cash author Schweizer's NY Post op-ed)