Uh, the judge set a trial date. That is past the dismissal stage.
FWIW, here is the big danger for Hillary Clinton...
“Klayman also asked the judge to order a “neutral forensic expert ... to take custody and control of the private email server and reconstruct and preserve the official U.S. Government records relating to the conduct of U.S. foreign policy during Defendant Secretary Clinton’s term as Secretary of State.”
Judge Middlebrooks has not yet ruled on Klayman’s request that the court seize Hillary Clinton’s server.
If Middle brook rules in favor of Judicial Watch, Clinton will have to produce the original servers and hard drives with all emails. If she doesn’t, she will be held in contempt of court by a Federal Judge. If she can’t, she will be in direct violation of the Federal Records Act.
I would be really interested to know the statute of limitations for violations of the Federal Records Act.
So, how bad is contempt of court? The Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar was charged with that, what happened to him? Nothing. Our Attorney General of the USA was charged with contempt of congress, what happened to him? same thing nothing. Some of the justice dept. lawyers were on the verge of being charged with that under Judge Hanan, who issued an injunction of BO’s memo amnesty, no big deal, who cares, everybody carry on. And HRC will shrug it off and continue to run for the POTUS and half of Americans will shrug it off and vote for her.
The memo amnesty, a judge stopped it, so Eric and Barack appealed, two more judges said no and they are contemplating on taking it to a higher court, even after the “constitutional scholar” BHO said 22 times he could not do what he did! It is getting very dangerous when the powers that be are not fazed with court punishments. Yet these same courts have all the power to overturn the votes of a major majority of voters, up to 41 million, when they voted only man woman marriage.