Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Regulator

You must be upset by the lack of Quakers on the Supreme Court.

Protestants are a majority, but I looked in the Constitution and couldn’t find the passage that proscribed a numeric connection between percentage religion of population and Supreme Court representation

There were no blacks on the Court in the beginning. Guess they shouldn’t be allowed. No Jews either.

Good luck marching backwards in time.


25 posted on 06/23/2015 11:42:43 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: sakic
You must be upset by the lack of Quakers on the Supreme Court

It would help! But I prefer Anabaptists, for their Protestant fundamentalism.

Good luck marching backwards in time

Oh, Got It, you're a Progressive! Who knew.

Isn't it interesting how "progress" is defined as replacing egalitarian Anglo Protestant norms with regressive feudalist notions like Socialism, usually with the people who bear those ideas?

You'll forgive me if I regard that as ordinary Soviet propaganda tactics - inverting the meaning of a word and labeling it the latest thing.

27 posted on 06/24/2015 1:21:27 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson