To: tanknetter; Sir Napsalot
From the article:
Since these two justices ignored problems caused by their conduct, the remainder of the court should have stepped in and addressed the issue for them, but the other seven justices have remained silent.”
The other justices should have at least forced the two to address the filing against them asking for their recusal.
32 posted on
06/22/2015 11:15:06 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray for their victory or quit saying you support our troops)
To: xzins
Yes, I read that part.
Silence from the other justices is the same as consent.
39 posted on
06/22/2015 11:22:31 AM PDT by
Sir Napsalot
(Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
To: xzins
unless they are going to be unanimouse because of the myth of born to behave.
76 posted on
06/22/2015 2:46:55 PM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson