To: lowbridge
“We’re not in a common conversation,” he said. “If you watch Fox News you inhabit a completely different world with different facts than if you read (the) New York Times,” he said. So he's upset that Fox is communicating facts that the Times would prefer to suppress?
3 posted on
06/22/2015 10:37:11 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(You don't notice it's a police state until the police come fokquote>r you.)
To: PapaBear3625
He’s upset there is a news outlet that would DARE to not parrot his meme.
19 posted on
06/22/2015 10:41:46 AM PDT by
V_TWIN
To: PapaBear3625
“We’re not in a common conversation,” he said.
Good. I do not want to have a conversation with him or his ilk.
Also...he’s petty!
And....I cannot WAIT until there’s new leadership at the helm.
40 posted on
06/22/2015 10:52:02 AM PDT by
kelly4c
(http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/post?id=2900389%2C41#help)
To: PapaBear3625
i concur- i read that and thought for the first time i agree with obama as the NYSlimes has an agenda which parallels obama’s, and lies all the time...
42 posted on
06/22/2015 10:53:46 AM PDT by
God luvs America
(63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
To: PapaBear3625
Facts are meaningless to liberals, because liberalism is insanity.
54 posted on
06/22/2015 11:11:54 AM PDT by
DennisR
(Look around - God gives countless, indisputable clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson