So even if things aren't changing, they are? Woof.
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
NASA is busy redefining data measurements to erase reality. Now we are hearing revisionism coming from the other "scientific" communities.
In truth it is selective data altering to meet the expectation instead of scientific data review to evaluate reality. I'm guessing there are big bucks in creating a crisis that can be constantly redefined to maintain a sense of urgency and impending doom.
In President Eisenhower's farewell speech to the country, this is the part we always hear quoted, as a matter of fact we get hammered with it:
"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex."
Here is part of that same speech we never hear:
"The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present – and is gravely to be regarded.
Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite. "