Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

$50 billion canal in Nicaragua could allow Chinese submarines to cross from the Atlantic to…
Daily Mail (UK) ^ | 13:15 EST, 19 June 2015 | James Dunn

Posted on 06/20/2015 9:27:08 PM PDT by Olog-hai

A $50 billion canal to be built by a Chinese tycoon in Nicaragua would be deep enough to allow submarines to pass through undetected.

Billionaire Wang Jing has spearheaded what is one of the biggest engineering projects in the world and is three times the size of any other canal, yet shipping forecasters don’t anticipate a need for such a route in terms of trading.

Many believe that Wang, who has not disclosed who his investors are, may be backed by the Chinese Government who hope to get a foothold in the continent where business has traditionally been dominated by the US. […]

The environmental impact could be catastrophic. The canal would cut through Lake Nicaragua, the largest fresh water body in Central America, which is an area of rich biodiversity and a vital habitat for many rare birds and fish. But the dredging that would be required to build the canal could transfer it into a “dead zone”. …

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Mexico; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: canal; china; chinacanal; mexico; monroedoctrine; nicaragua; nicaraguacanal; panama; panamacanal; redchina; submarines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Full title: $50 billion canal in Nicaragua could allow Chinese submarines to cross from the Atlantic to the Pacific undetected

But Fareed Zakaria said don’t fear the “rise of the rest”, so no worries.

1 posted on 06/20/2015 9:27:08 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
on the assumption it could get past the SOSUS system that would be placed on both ends of the canal route that is
2 posted on 06/20/2015 9:30:49 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

How deep would it be?


3 posted on 06/20/2015 9:31:56 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Article says 26 meters, which is 85¼ feet.


4 posted on 06/20/2015 9:43:44 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chode

Obama would put SOSUS there?


5 posted on 06/20/2015 9:44:24 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The U.S. Navy could but Obama probably won’t let them. It might appear too aggressive.


6 posted on 06/20/2015 9:50:59 PM PDT by BBell (Identifies as a knight who says "NI"!!!!!! I want a shrubbery!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
the suckhole won't be in office when/if it's finished... we can only hope a real American will be in office by then
7 posted on 06/20/2015 9:55:45 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Article says 26 meters, which is 85¼ feet.

Is that deep enough for a submarine to go through submerged? The article says: "undetected".

Piloting a submerged sub through a canal seems like it would be a remarkable feat.

8 posted on 06/20/2015 10:41:04 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

It would be easier to put a sub on a cargo ship and take it through that way.

If you knew that subs could cross through, you would watch both ends of the canal.


9 posted on 06/20/2015 10:48:24 PM PDT by mountainbunny (Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens ~ JR.R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

This is ridicules, 85 foot deep? What no Locks? Me thinks these Chinese are either smoking some really good stuff or they figure we are.

As you say, it would be a fine feat to navigate such submerged only to find an unfriendly attack boat waiting at the outlet.


10 posted on 06/20/2015 11:19:10 PM PDT by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mountainbunny

Obama would?


11 posted on 06/20/2015 11:45:39 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
I cannot think of a passageway for submarines more easily obstructed than a canal only 85 feet deep. We have technology today capable of detecting evidence of minerals by radar hundreds of feet under the ground and I cannot imagine that every movement in such a canal will be anything other than an open book.

While I deplore the loss of Panama Canal and I fear the intentions of the Chinese with respect to the Nicaraguan Canal, those fears are economic fears grounded in a fear of a mercantilist emerging superpower.


12 posted on 06/20/2015 11:47:00 PM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt

Would Obama send any?


13 posted on 06/20/2015 11:49:47 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

The submarine thing is a red herring. That kind of a choke point would turn submarines into targets.

I see only economic benefits. If the Chinese want to spend their capital to compete with the Panama canal, it is just going to mean lower shipping costs for the entire world, and the US is going to be one of the greatest winners in the process.


14 posted on 06/21/2015 4:01:32 AM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
The movement of submarines is addressed in the Law of the Sea Treaty, which China has ratified.

The only nations that haven't ratified UNCLOS are Turkey, Syria, Israel, Iran, and the US.

15 posted on 06/21/2015 4:24:38 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Just being covered by a few feet of water would not make them “undetected”.


16 posted on 06/21/2015 4:26:13 AM PDT by Hugin ("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!",)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Obama would put SOSUS there?

He would contract it out to Chinese companies....

I finally got my OPM notif that my data may have been included in the "Chinese hack" due to the Chinese contract to manage the data. Very careful to decline responsibility and they gave me a free 18 month credit/info monitoring deal with CSID.

17 posted on 06/21/2015 4:31:31 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
Is that deep enough for a submarine to go through submerged? The article says: "undetected".

No. No rational submarine commander will submerge without having several hundred feet of water under his keel.

18 posted on 06/21/2015 4:35:58 AM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Obama would put SOSUS there?

Most if not all of SOSUS was moth-balled back in the 1990's.

19 posted on 06/21/2015 4:38:06 AM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

This sounds like BS to me.


20 posted on 06/21/2015 4:42:38 AM PDT by McGruff (It's gonna get ugly round here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson