[IAMNO1]

Agree with your sentiments. What I wonder about is why we are still arguing about and considering table scraps? Perry and a host of them are nonstarters in my mind. I wish we'd (FR) concentrate on the very best of the pack, not on guys who have some positives but a whole lot of negatives, and divide the field. I personally am for for Cruz (pretty much 100% at this point), but am open to Walker (maybe 90%), even a couple of the others suspects (80%?). I'd like to see an honest open dialogue of just a few of the brightest most representative most likely candidates here and forget about all these other nonstarters, and that being a discussion at the adults table, not the kids, that has so often been the case in the last couple of weeks.

[South40]

I personally am for for Cruz (pretty much 100% at this point), but am open to Walker (maybe 90%), even a couple of the others suspects (80%?)

Same here.

But as long as Perry or any others are in the race they are worthy of debate. Perry more so for the humor. :-)