To: dware
“Criminals...suing the property owner...whose property rights they violated...this is satire, right? RIGHT?!?!”
Actually, if one takes the time to read the article, the property owner gave his permission to allow ‘artists’ to do their thing.
To: TexasGator
Actually, if one takes the time to read the article, the property owner gave his permission to allow ‘artists’ to do their thing.I musta not been paying close enough attention, because I didn't catch that part. In that case, I rescind my 'criminal' moniker. If said owner gave permission, well then, he's clearly in quite the pickle.
32 posted on
06/17/2015 10:08:59 AM PDT by
dware
(Yeah, so? What are you going to do about it?)
To: TexasGator
““Criminals...suing the property owner...whose property rights they violated...this is satire, right? RIGHT?!?!””
Well, NO, we let Mexicans break into our country and then look the other way when the murder and rape us. Same difference!
To: TexasGator
But the owners still legally possess the building. It's their building. If they want to erase the paint or knock the whole building down, that's their right.
To: TexasGator
Actually, if one takes the time to read the article, the property owner gave his permission to allow ‘artists’ to do their thing.And then he revoked that permission. His property, his right to do so.
78 posted on
06/17/2015 11:25:39 AM PDT by
IYAS9YAS
(Has anyone seen my tagline? It was here yesterday. I seem to have misplaced it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson