Skip to comments.
Graffiti artists suing 5Pointz owner for whitewashing their work from building
NY Daily News ^
| June 12, 2015
| Ginger Adams Otis
Posted on 06/17/2015 9:50:15 AM PDT by Zakeet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-103 last
To: IYAS9YAS
“(2) With respect to works of visual art created before the effective date set forth in section 610(a) of the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990, but title to which has not, as of such effective date, been transferred from the author, the rights conferred by subsection (a) shall be coextensive with, and shall expire at the same time as, the rights conferred by section 106. “
Dig deeper ...
To: Resolute Conservative
Vandalism is a crime. Unless the owner asked them to paint it and even then it is his property and he can do as he sees fit. If I owned a Picasso and decide to paint over it that is my business not your nor the world’s. Yup. And for most of Picasso's works, that would be no great loss for the world IMO.
102
posted on
06/17/2015 12:16:31 PM PDT
by
zeugma
(http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3294350/posts)
To: TexasGator
Dig deeper ...Don't need to, unless they can prove that no artist ever covered up another artist's work, they lose.
103
posted on
06/17/2015 12:21:11 PM PDT
by
IYAS9YAS
(Has anyone seen my tagline? It was here yesterday. I seem to have misplaced it.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-103 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson