Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Erik Latranyi
You cannot deny that they are writing the rules to stack the deck in favor of passing trade bills.

Do you think that is, in any way, in keeping without our form of government?

Our Founders warned of foreign entanglements.

I'd say TPA certainly makes passage of trade agreements easier. I'd go further and say it makes trade agreements possible.

The reason we have these congressional-executive agreements in the first place is the nearly universal acknowledgment that you won't get an agreement without them.

If you want to be isolationist and think it's best for us not to have any regulation of international trade, fine, but in the real world trade happens and it's best for us to have some role in setting the rules.

82 posted on 06/18/2015 6:57:22 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: semimojo
The reason we have these congressional-executive agreements in the first place is the nearly universal acknowledgment that you won't get an agreement without them.

Yeah, amending the Constitution is too difficult as well. Let's just write a work-around so we can pass laws that are blatantly unconstitutional.

Oh, we've done that with the commerce clause already.

83 posted on 06/18/2015 9:15:38 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Scott Walker - a more conservative governor than Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson