Secret instructions of the Jesuits
by Brownlee, W. C. (William Craig), 1784-1860
Published 1857
photo-copied from the Boston College Library
As for the Oath I posted....
"The text of the Jesuit Extreme Oath of Induction is meticulously recorded in the Journals of the 62nd Congress, 3rd Session, of the United States Congressional Record (House Calendar No. 397, Report No. 1523, 15 February, 1913, pp. 3215-3216). However, without explanation, the text was subsequently torn out of the Congressional Record, but not before it was copied word for word by several researchers, including Ian Paisley for the European Institute of Protestant Studies."
One could argue that since the page (torn out) is no longer in the Congressional Record that it never existed, however reading the history of the Jesuits, the shoe fits.
Can you honestly tell me that this man only wants to serve Christ and has no shady agenda? Matthew 7:16 says, "You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes nor figs from thistles, are they?"
Honestly, I fervently pray that I am wrong about this man. As a Protestant, I have never before feared a RC Pope in my lifetime. A few I have regarded as good and men, even though I disagreed with their doctrine. But this Pope..... well, even the Catholic here know there is something wrong with him.
Yes, it is a hoax. Obviously. Just do a little searching on the internet, there are many Protestants and Evangelicals who are embarrassed by this garbage. And Ian Paisley buys into the scam artist Alberto Rivera, who is the one who came up with the Jesuits assassinating Lincoln, starting WWI and II, and having a giant supercomputer underneath the Vatican with all the Protestant names and locations which he told to Jack Chick who then made tracts out of them. Look them up.
If you are interested in how something like that could get into the library of congress, the record is out there. It was attached to a report about its use as propaganda in an election in Pennsylvania in 1912, and it was called the ‘oath of the Knights of Columbus,’ which might be even more ridiculous. And as far as I know is still there. Do a search.
FR actually bans the false Jesuit oath and the Oath of the Knights of Columbus from the religion forum. Of course that might be because the Evangelical owners are frightened by the threat of Albino Assassin Monks who might slay them for allowing such obvious truths. Or something.
FReegards